Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756708AbYAIAQZ (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Jan 2008 19:16:25 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751765AbYAIAQR (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Jan 2008 19:16:17 -0500 Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.1.138]:39945 "EHLO mx3.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751282AbYAIAQQ (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Jan 2008 19:16:16 -0500 Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 01:15:55 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: Sam Ravnborg Cc: Rik van Riel , Paolo Ciarrocchi , tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com, Linux Kernel , trivial@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] x86: coding style fixes in arch/x86/ia32/ia32_aout.c Message-ID: <20080109001555.GA31289@elte.hu> References: <20080108203233.01bb5c7f@paolo-desktop> <20080108150439.6388028e@bree.surriel.com> <20080108215247.GE14829@elte.hu> <20080108221722.GA27698@uranus.ravnborg.org> <20080108223554.GE21482@elte.hu> <20080108235719.GA28353@uranus.ravnborg.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080108235719.GA28353@uranus.ravnborg.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.5 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.5 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.3 -1.5 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1328 Lines: 32 * Sam Ravnborg wrote: > > > > Firstly, anyone with a forked kernel with outstanding patches > > > > that are not in x86.git only has themselves to blame. We want to > > > > actively discourage forking and sitting on patches too long. > > > > > > Curious - what is the purpose of the x86.git tree these days? > > > > what do want to imply by 'these days'? > > I wondered when you wrote "anyone with a forked kernel with > outstanding patches that are not in x86.git" if this was only x86 > specific patches or more than that. I could have a slev of patches in > the works for parts that are no x86 specific (which I unfortunately do > not have). ah, i now understand what you mean. The stuff in -mm that touches arch/x86 is for actively maintained areas which are generally quite clean. So this is not a problem in practice - massively unclean areas of code, which are the primary target for cleanups, are not actively developed. [ perhaps because there's some level of correlation between unclean code and lack of developer interest :-/ ] Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/