Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-107212-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.48.161 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.48.161;
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2024 09:16:40 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, Guixiong Wei <weiguixiong@bytedance.com>,
	jgross@suse.com, mingo@redhat.com, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com,
	x86@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, peterz@infradead.org,
	gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, tony.luck@intel.com,
	adobriyan@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86, relocs: Ignore relocations in .notes section on
 walk_relocs
Message-ID: <20240319081640.GAZflJ6IBQ7TEKD2Ll@fat_crate.local>
References: <20240317150547.24910-1-weiguixiong@bytedance.com>
 <171079804927.224083.15609364452504732018.b4-ty@chromium.org>
 <20240318215612.GDZfi4fG52DTgra51p@fat_crate.local>
 <202403181644.690285D3@keescook>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <202403181644.690285D3@keescook>

On Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 04:45:45PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> The commit it refs to landed via -hardening,

Yap, saw that. It should've gone through tip too as it is clearly a tip
tree patch.

> responsibility of landing this fix too. But it's fine to go via -tip
> if you prefer?

Yes, please. Just send a Reviewed-by and it'll get picked up.

Btw, while looking at that second patch, why does it have *three* Fixes:
tags? I think it wants to fix only your

aaa8736370db ("x86, relocs: Ignore relocations in .notes section")

?

Thx.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette