Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-107659-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1;
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2024 20:05:49 +0530
From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
Cc: Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@gmail.com>,
	Gustavo Pimentel <gustavo.pimentel@synopsys.com>,
	Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof =?utf-8?Q?Wilczy=C5=84ski?= <kw@linux.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@kernel.org>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: endpoint: Migrate to Genalloc framework for
 outbound window memory allocation
Message-ID: <20240319143549.GB3297@thinkpad>
References: <20240317-pci-ep-genalloc-v1-1-70fe52a3b9be@linaro.org>
 <20240318170843.GA1187538@bhelgaas>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <20240318170843.GA1187538@bhelgaas>

On Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 12:08:43PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 17, 2024 at 11:39:17AM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> > As proposed during the last year 'PCI Endpoint Subsystem Open Items
> > Discussion' of Linux Plumbers conference [1], let's migrate to Genalloc
> > framework for managing the endpoint outbound window memory allocation.
> > 
> > PCI Endpoint subsystem is using a custom memory allocator in pci-epc-mem
> > driver from the start for managing the memory required to map the host
> > address space (outbound) in endpoint. Even though it works well, it
> > completely defeats the purpose of the 'Genalloc framework', a general
> > purpose memory allocator framework created to avoid various custom memory
> > allocators in the kernel.
> 
> Nice idea.  I wonder if something like this could be done for PCI BAR
> assignment, i.e., the stuff in setup-bus.c.  There are a lot of
> constraints there, so maybe it wouldn't be practical.
> 

I took a quick look at it and I share the same view.

> > The migration to Genalloc framework is done is such a way that the existing
> > API semantics are preserved. So that the callers of the EPC mem APIs do not
> > need any modification (apart from the pcie-designware-epc driver that
> > queries page size).
> > 
> > Internally, the EPC mem driver now uses Genalloc framework's
> > 'gen_pool_first_fit_order_align' algorithm that aligns the allocated memory
> > based on the requested size as like the previous allocator. And the
> > page size passed during pci_epc_mem_init() API is used as the minimum order
> > for the memory allocations.
> 
> /as like the previous allocator/as the previous allocator did/
> 
> > During the migration, 'struct pci_epc_mem' is removed as it is seems
> > redundant and the existing 'struct pci_epc_mem_window' in 'struct pci_epc'
> > is now used to hold the address windows of the endpoint controller.
> 
> s/as it is seems/as it seems/
> 
> If this is not a logically required part of the conversion, could the
> pci_epc_mem removal be a separate patch?
> 

genalloc migration essentially makes the 'struct pci_epc_mem' unused. So I
thought it makes sense to remove it in the same patch. But I do not have a
stronger opinion to not split it.

So, I can split it in next version.

> The docs refer to it as "genalloc", i.e., not capitalized:
> https://docs.kernel.org/core-api/genalloc.html
> 

Ok. Will change it.

- Mani

-- 
மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்