Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753782AbYAIBw6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Jan 2008 20:52:58 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751480AbYAIBwt (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Jan 2008 20:52:49 -0500 Received: from smtp110.mail.mud.yahoo.com ([209.191.85.220]:22203 "HELO smtp110.mail.mud.yahoo.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1751122AbYAIBws (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Jan 2008 20:52:48 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com.au; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:From:To:Subject:Date:User-Agent:Cc:References:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Disposition:Message-Id; b=u16bU3gJmRYNeYU6i5RMA7apskcrt9LDBs3hJdQRGcb4W0tOjMlq1BiWiyOLpcwQ9WBYru3NZuI5ILZkiVrtW7PHxyErAIC2bpytENgsIi6CDn27OFKbV/YAdDLsOgg4ow7toy4tIGu6cUSSpmgXb7/J+bBzvPoU4E+OqWBjEHc= ; X-YMail-OSG: MA.8_ZQVM1nI9UYxJbsg1KuxP.9epvxAlhslGgZqkleHoTXd3sBrbAVdSvK6x9GAFRMFzpMNDQ-- X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 From: Nick Piggin To: David Howells Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/28] FS-Cache: Recruit a couple of page flags for cache management [try #2] Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 12:52:37 +1100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 Cc: viro@ftp.linux.org.uk, hch@infradead.org, Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com, sds@tycho.nsa.gov, casey@schaufler-ca.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, selinux@tycho.nsa.gov, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org References: <200801081401.11975.nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> <7972.1199711343@redhat.com> <31207.1199836284@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <31207.1199836284@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200801091252.37565.nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1239 Lines: 30 On Wednesday 09 January 2008 10:51, David Howells wrote: > Nick Piggin wrote: > > > Nick Piggin wrote: > > > > No. I mean call the bit PG_private2. That way non-pagecache and > > > > filesystems that don't use fscache can use it. > > > > > > The bit is called PG_owner_priv_2, and then 'subclassed' to PG_fscache, > > > much like PG_owner_priv_1 is 'subclassed' to PG_checked as was > > > recommended. > > > > It is not owner_priv if you're putting checks and tests into core > > kernel pagecache code for it. owner_priv means a filesystem has it > > _all_ to itself. > > Okay, I'll change it if it makes you happy. It is to make everybody happy. Especially in code that everyone works on like mm/ and fs/, you can't just have everybody following their own slightly different conventions. > Bear in mind, though, you're > dictating instructions that conflict with those other people have dictated. Can you point me to the posts. Thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/