Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754090AbYAIEB5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Jan 2008 23:01:57 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752141AbYAIEBt (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Jan 2008 23:01:49 -0500 Received: from turing-police.cc.vt.edu ([128.173.14.107]:49701 "EHLO turing-police.cc.vt.edu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751438AbYAIEBt (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Jan 2008 23:01:49 -0500 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.7.2 01/07/2005 with nmh-1.2 To: Matthew Wilcox Cc: Willy Tarreau , Adrian Bunk , James Bottomley , Ingo Molnar , Peter Osterlund , Linus Torvalds , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , Al Viro Subject: Re: [patch] scsi: revert "[SCSI] Get rid of scsi_cmnd->done" In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 07 Jan 2008 16:19:30 MST." <20080107231930.GC16309@parisc-linux.org> From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu References: <20080106171158.GM20473@parisc-linux.org> <1199640983.5205.65.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20080106183402.GA7906@1wt.eu> <20080106185625.GM2082@does.not.exist> <20080106191044.GA1105@1wt.eu> <20080106195802.GN2082@does.not.exist> <20080106210813.GA10136@1wt.eu> <19438.1199739038@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> <20080107213717.GB16309@parisc-linux.org> <26581.1199747065@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> <20080107231930.GC16309@parisc-linux.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_1199851267_3703P"; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2008 23:01:07 -0500 Message-ID: <8336.1199851267@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1447 Lines: 36 --==_Exmh_1199851267_3703P Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Mon, 07 Jan 2008 16:19:30 MST, Matthew Wilcox said: > On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 06:04:25PM -0500, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote: > > Theoretically, at least. Sometimes, in the real world, other constraints > > enter into it... > > So you're saying that you can't find reliable ways to reproduce problems > on demand? Those are some of the lower quality bug reports, so I don't > think we're losing much by having you not report them. I'm sure that *everybody* on this list would *love* to know how you find a reliable way to reproduce all the bugs that start off with "after X days of uptime". But when you're chasing what might be a race condition with a very small timing hole, you may need an event to happen several million times before the accumulated chance of hitting it becomes appreciable. --==_Exmh_1199851267_3703P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 iD8DBQFHhEcDcC3lWbTT17ARAmyPAJsE0OHlYbURRy8hKMkHpcavm2UGWQCfYep9 IDAQ2Gwdp0girq2PGi4VKb0= =hzjY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==_Exmh_1199851267_3703P-- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/