Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755511AbYAIEDu (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Jan 2008 23:03:50 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751735AbYAIEDm (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Jan 2008 23:03:42 -0500 Received: from turing-police.cc.vt.edu ([128.173.14.107]:38452 "EHLO turing-police.cc.vt.edu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752075AbYAIEDl (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Jan 2008 23:03:41 -0500 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.7.2 01/07/2005 with nmh-1.2 To: Matthew Wilcox Cc: Willy Tarreau , Adrian Bunk , James Bottomley , Ingo Molnar , Peter Osterlund , Linus Torvalds , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , Al Viro Subject: Re: [patch] scsi: revert "[SCSI] Get rid of scsi_cmnd->done" In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 07 Jan 2008 16:19:30 MST." <20080107231930.GC16309@parisc-linux.org> From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu References: <20080106171158.GM20473@parisc-linux.org> <1199640983.5205.65.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20080106183402.GA7906@1wt.eu> <20080106185625.GM2082@does.not.exist> <20080106191044.GA1105@1wt.eu> <20080106195802.GN2082@does.not.exist> <20080106210813.GA10136@1wt.eu> <19438.1199739038@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> <20080107213717.GB16309@parisc-linux.org> <26581.1199747065@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> <20080107231930.GC16309@parisc-linux.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_1199851394_3703P"; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2008 23:03:14 -0500 Message-ID: <8425.1199851394@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1455 Lines: 42 --==_Exmh_1199851394_3703P Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Mon, 07 Jan 2008 16:19:30 MST, Matthew Wilcox said: > So you're saying that you can't find reliable ways to reproduce problems > on demand? Those are some of the lower quality bug reports, so I don't > think we're losing much by having you not report them. And in the next e-mail in my lkml folder we see: On Mon, 07 Jan 2008 18:21:45 EST, Parag Warudkar said: > BTW, I have so far tested 2.6.24-rc4/5/6/7 and 2.6.23.12 - all of > which have this problem. > > Yesterday I went back to using 2.6.22.15 and after a day's uptime it > has not reproduced with the same config. > > Time for git-bisect I suppose? (the only problem is that this takes > anywhere between 20 minutes to 8 hrs to confirm reliably.) Are you saying that we're not losing much if Parag says "screw it" and doesn't report the problem? --==_Exmh_1199851394_3703P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 iD4DBQFHhEeCcC3lWbTT17ARAsmYAJjzVHPuZcMSp67tFS8H35sHHIyLAJ4pm0To QaRRTPtHfCShChu/YF+48g== =Jypo -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==_Exmh_1199851394_3703P-- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/