Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755404AbYAIEm0 (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Jan 2008 23:42:26 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752929AbYAIEmR (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Jan 2008 23:42:17 -0500 Received: from [212.12.190.53] ([212.12.190.53]:34893 "EHLO raad.intranet" rhost-flags-FAIL-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752847AbYAIEmQ (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Jan 2008 23:42:16 -0500 X-Greylist: delayed 26332 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Tue, 08 Jan 2008 23:42:15 EST From: Al Boldi To: Rik van Riel Subject: Re: [RFD] Incremental fsck Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 07:40:12 +0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.5 Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <200801090022.55589.a1426z@gawab.com> <20080108164106.735c431d@bree.surriel.com> In-Reply-To: <20080108164106.735c431d@bree.surriel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200801090740.12989.a1426z@gawab.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 645 Lines: 24 Rik van Riel wrote: > Al Boldi wrote: > > Has there been some thought about an incremental fsck? > > > > You know, somehow fencing a sub-dir to do an online fsck? > > Search for "chunkfs" Sure, and there is TileFS too. But why wouldn't it be possible to do this on the current fs infrastructure, using just a smart fsck, working incrementally on some sub-dir? Thanks! -- Al -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/