Received: by 2002:ab2:620c:0:b0:1ef:ffd0:ce49 with SMTP id o12csp1440010lqt; Wed, 20 Mar 2024 04:19:43 -0700 (PDT) X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=2; AJvYcCWOTg5pOlVviVgFjhbfMgEgfoprjyI6c09Dfp65iyHHqMR9frwfvvGpVnFiGQpXWTimQsclC7CPj9ZmkCNDWTUbUcTwjf2v2dBzWRER7A== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEY1E5W1wm+Kv0QnBhElXBAYKxBtDml9mZx06DxVnyRv4TQjY27ZzK03aha+Ic986/lq+a2 X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:5487:b0:566:806a:6f9e with SMTP id fg7-20020a056402548700b00566806a6f9emr4000692edb.28.1710933582992; Wed, 20 Mar 2024 04:19:42 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from am.mirrors.kernel.org (am.mirrors.kernel.org. [2604:1380:4601:e00::3]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id eo4-20020a056402530400b00566ff420d51si6475666edb.295.2024.03.20.04.19.42 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 20 Mar 2024 04:19:42 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-108841-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:4601:e00::3 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:4601:e00::3; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=fyN1zphy; arc=fail (body hash mismatch); spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-108841-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:4601:e00::3 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-108841-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org"; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: from smtp.subspace.kernel.org (wormhole.subspace.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by am.mirrors.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B43541F2139B for ; Wed, 20 Mar 2024 11:19:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B897E3D541; Wed, 20 Mar 2024 11:19:31 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="fyN1zphy" Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DEFD11171D; Wed, 20 Mar 2024 11:19:30 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1710933571; cv=none; b=RS+bXQaNLkcVhp35pVDR32YMoLt3xVSj0EKUDQowIvjXnZIgo5+vjsaBXTTAppI5qOCE5+XIfpOQahFTrVoCaeZv0WHV0B/x+DC/IIY8O/93r1FW0HqSoj4+0VnHZ9hKGYqz7KV7h9dN8/DgnAvEDeoTR4hI8pnPm5wFumu6LsA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1710933571; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ZGjdmKze+W8MptFXyZLv1/NCN4+JrhWDnVc972JzEF8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=KBIhr6YHwXHeSLGOjWzxZo5EgckS/Xbbzyb7SxIiaqajK/9ZHDtIIQC7l8B1vPbqSCcCD8PF3l01YfZ9Cupe/2FbUEsY9ufBaDdpeZftgURJixJZ4pNjRiWu92MLBPPgS0Emwldf2EkpGX0HFcmkbFKCDV3aQ+gcFvRsqGyaulY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=fyN1zphy; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2CCF9C433C7; Wed, 20 Mar 2024 11:19:28 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1710933570; bh=ZGjdmKze+W8MptFXyZLv1/NCN4+JrhWDnVc972JzEF8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=fyN1zphyJpnuHnDx7UpdrrSMXLAs8FwjMy2i14ohff6IKAt3jk1kD8DQw1aWs60J+ X0lDM0yCzd7FRs21GUXslXmcDacFrUGk3IEXB9hYyuYdBgDd0lipaVEfv5jycSape/ iD/V9tMzSENbTM2tUTL+7VsAiwbN/QvYW3rhiIdPhR7vdy/DAQ6JAybzhJYXoOJ2TG r3uDzb0cYcbrbVBzhmJlOYOuTylN9j0N2aYJpnnDNnUTnrz1NqunH3vBwm2cVFnL9a W9tCJPpU7YaIE3LImFQ++UjFmgZTfl8bjcM4UxQb1cAaJ4XJJXwPfNpizq77QT+8xq O4WTAkzZvulJA== Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2024 11:19:26 +0000 From: Simon Horman To: Erwan Velu Cc: Erwan Velu , Jesse Brandeburg , Tony Nguyen , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH iwl-net] i40e: Report MFS in decimal base instead of hex Message-ID: <20240320111926.GR185808@kernel.org> References: <20240319141657.2783609-1-e.velu@criteo.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240319141657.2783609-1-e.velu@criteo.com> On Tue, Mar 19, 2024 at 03:16:55PM +0100, Erwan Velu wrote: > If the MFS is set below the default (0x2600), a warning message is > reported like the following : > > MFS for port 1 has been set below the default: 600 > > This message is a bit confusing as the number shown here (600) is in > fact an hexa number: 0x600 = 1536 > > Without any explicit "0x" prefix, this message is read like the MFS is > set to 600 bytes. > > MFS, as per MTUs, are usually expressed in decimal base. > > This commit reports both current and default MFS values in decimal > so it's less confusing for end-users. > > A typical warning message looks like the following : > > MFS for port 1 (1536) has been set below the default (9728) > Hi Erwan, If this is for (iwl-)net, then it should probably have a Fixes tag. I expect it is sufficient to respond to this email with an appropriate tag. > Signed-off-by: Erwan Velu That not withstanding, this looks good to me. Reviewed-by: Simon Horman ..