Received: by 2002:ab2:6857:0:b0:1ef:ffd0:ce49 with SMTP id l23csp57950lqp; Wed, 20 Mar 2024 13:38:20 -0700 (PDT) X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=2; AJvYcCX2DbNmgi9dCVPjZ5kMvwz2zznpTDv6SbZTjTF14Kz+JLo+pAOh5+AmQCvf92O39bAdOQWWqTSCRZaI0/BolXHDrOapt5XOz9TDN2h8oA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFTJQkPGfMk+5sleLpDsR9GsKwPzhw3yPwPZVJcGzL6HZubsaV/5DPNPcyuisbvipRPP5ZD X-Received: by 2002:a0c:e44b:0:b0:696:3cdb:13f5 with SMTP id d11-20020a0ce44b000000b006963cdb13f5mr5241860qvm.20.1710967099830; Wed, 20 Mar 2024 13:38:19 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from ny.mirrors.kernel.org (ny.mirrors.kernel.org. [2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id g10-20020a0562140aca00b00690b96fe021si13862197qvi.399.2024.03.20.13.38.19 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 20 Mar 2024 13:38:19 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-109403-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@intel.com header.s=Intel header.b=QgJGxvIL; arc=fail (body hash mismatch); spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-109403-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-109403-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org"; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: from smtp.subspace.kernel.org (wormhole.subspace.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ny.mirrors.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8AAA61C20E84 for ; Wed, 20 Mar 2024 20:38:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DC5142057; Wed, 20 Mar 2024 20:38:13 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="QgJGxvIL" Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4547B1B7F5; Wed, 20 Mar 2024 20:38:10 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.19 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1710967092; cv=none; b=i/tRzWiED9WMDVw3+gKiwjuudphTdDyhwWQ1Sg7mOsuozzkIrDoH1nqKn9ohxxXWNTD75bf9KjyfNE9xO/pEbZ36+1KewZGNQfGoSF13NxS3/41GmDkir6glSGzdusP2m0RSlhQE933XwzkytSZ72MGyWU0cNH3FQh9RoA+8W/0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1710967092; c=relaxed/simple; bh=hNgRL40LSQB7xQcowVuzTKGVxepJYYGDnej/MLNsDIE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=YXYAVA9vUmRxJkEHo9xahIxwtudP6zfkwmP53peM7TgeAVOzo6LB45+7eAUxlPJeJPjzIzbBHeq7nYT4rjdR1c41kyMriZD39d2MWOd+gkPxXTbp3Zt2TH95u8hr9iKXbSPw5hbzxbWNh+Mau4ErsWgaLcXZdz/eO5Hhi4zu710= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=QgJGxvIL; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.19 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1710967091; x=1742503091; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=hNgRL40LSQB7xQcowVuzTKGVxepJYYGDnej/MLNsDIE=; b=QgJGxvIL5Ame/tjQhnONkB8JFVUSufY1AqI9EyQDOKjnOeZsH0PySuyj jrx7vWnOrYaLJ/LWK+U6JuVCcty3Z/27nu5obz1jyU1jNXF3P+1Y+3zo1 yxYHVs0X3FcN/k0QIAJgceJugMm/y15bXZVW0MsXj7x5JEjrfW9zAbs1I y1KLgzgLGPq90nZRP4e7KdiMHSDhzdnFhILMFRwOSqaweeMfjDeiJxtaW Woy27HPSnzmM63e1G96jtCNAVaLrQXREowoFzzSGq4saAzIeLbAQekzSU yYHQw85P7olwKNd4qF0HBSI/lRUYmGTg3+TLa/DBp1Ghy6Oy8Q0kVA/iY w==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,11019"; a="5792099" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.07,141,1708416000"; d="scan'208";a="5792099" Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by orvoesa111.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 20 Mar 2024 13:38:09 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,11019"; a="914678292" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.07,141,1708416000"; d="scan'208";a="914678292" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.54]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 20 Mar 2024 13:38:06 -0700 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.97) (envelope-from ) id 1rn2hH-0000000EgP1-2vqb; Wed, 20 Mar 2024 22:38:03 +0200 Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2024 22:38:03 +0200 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Vasileios Amoiridis Cc: jic23@kernel.org, lars@metafoo.de, ang.iglesiasg@gmail.com, mazziesaccount@gmail.com, ak@it-klinger.de, petre.rodan@subdimension.ro, phil@raspberrypi.com, 579lpy@gmail.com, linus.walleij@linaro.org, semen.protsenko@linaro.org, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/6] iio: pressure: Add timestamp and scan_masks for BMP280 driver Message-ID: References: <20240319002925.2121016-1-vassilisamir@gmail.com> <20240319002925.2121016-6-vassilisamir@gmail.com> <20240320184516.GB36450@vamoiridPC> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240320184516.GB36450@vamoiridPC> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 07:45:16PM +0100, Vasileios Amoiridis wrote: > On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 01:07:07PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 19, 2024 at 01:29:24AM +0100, Vasileios Amoiridis wrote: .. > > > +enum bmp280_scan { > > > + BMP280_TEMP, > > > + BMP280_PRESS, > > > + BME280_HUMID > > > > The last is not a terminator, please leave trailing comma. > > > > > +}; > > What do you mean it is not a terminator? In general with the enum > variables I would write: > > enum var { a, b, c }; This example is different to what you used. I.o.w. _this_ example is okay. > Why in this case there is a comma needed after the BME280_HUMID element? It's pure style issue that helps to avoid the unneeded churn in the future in case the list is getting expanded. You can easily imagine what I mean. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko