Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-109440-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.199.223 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.199.223;
From: Vasileios Amoiridis <vassilisamir@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2024 22:35:05 +0100
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Vasileios Amoiridis <vassilisamir@gmail.com>, jic23@kernel.org,
	lars@metafoo.de, ang.iglesiasg@gmail.com, mazziesaccount@gmail.com,
	ak@it-klinger.de, petre.rodan@subdimension.ro, phil@raspberrypi.com,
	579lpy@gmail.com, linus.walleij@linaro.org,
	semen.protsenko@linaro.org, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/6] iio: pressure: Add triggered buffer support for
 BMP280 driver
Message-ID: <20240320213505.GB52721@vamoiridPC>
References: <20240319002925.2121016-1-vassilisamir@gmail.com>
 <20240319002925.2121016-7-vassilisamir@gmail.com>
 <ZfrFc9GF0_Jix5YT@smile.fi.intel.com>
 <20240320174602.GA36450@vamoiridPC>
 <ZftUWg31QvA99syr@smile.fi.intel.com>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <ZftUWg31QvA99syr@smile.fi.intel.com>

On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 11:25:46PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 06:46:02PM +0100, Vasileios Amoiridis wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 01:16:03PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > On Tue, Mar 19, 2024 at 01:29:25AM +0100, Vasileios Amoiridis wrote:
> 
> ...
> 
> > > >  	/*
> > > > -	 * Maximum number of consecutive bytes read for a temperature or
> > > > -	 * pressure measurement is 3.
> > > > +	 * Maximum number of a burst read for temperature, pressure, humidity
> > > > +	 * is 8 bytes.
> > > >  	 */
> > > > -	if (val_size > 3)
> > > > +	if (val_size > 8)
> > > 
> > > sizeof() / new definition for the buf[] size?
> > 
> > In a previous commit that I was fixing this SPI driver, Jonathan had mentioned
> > that there is no need for a specific definition since it will only be used
> > here so that's why I kept it as is.
> 
> It seems not only here, but also in the buf[] definition in the struct.
> 

You are totally right, I didn't think of that!
It makes sense to use a definition.

Cheers,
Vasilis

> -- 
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko
> 
>