Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-109734-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.48.161 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.48.161;
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2024 08:38:00 +0100
From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: liu.yec@h3c.com
Cc: daniel.thompson@linaro.org, dianders@chromium.org,
	jason.wessel@windriver.com, jirislaby@kernel.org,
	kgdb-bugreport@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-serial@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] kdb: Fix the deadlock issue in KDB debugging.
Message-ID: <2024032137-parrot-sandbank-ab29@gregkh>
References: <20240320162802.GA22198@aspen.lan>
 <20240321022604.4088438-1-liu.yec@h3c.com>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20240321022604.4088438-1-liu.yec@h3c.com>

On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 10:26:04AM +0800, liu.yec@h3c.com wrote:
> From: LiuYe <liu.yeC@h3c.com>
> 
> Currently, if CONFIG_KDB_KEYBOARD is enabled, then kgdboc will
> attempt to use schedule_work() to provoke a keyboard reset when
> transitioning out of the debugger and back to normal operation.
> This can cause deadlock because schedule_work() is not NMI-safe.
> 
> The stack trace below shows an example of the problem. In this
> case the master cpu is not running from NMI but it has parked
> the slave CPUs using an NMI and the parked CPUs is holding
> spinlocks needed by schedule_work().
> 
> example:
>  BUG: spinlock lockup suspected on CPU#0, namex/10450
>  lock: 0xffff881ffe823980, .magic: dead4ead, .owner: namexx/21888, .owner_cpu: 1
>  ffff881741d00000 ffff881741c01000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
>  ffff881740f58e78 ffff881741cffdd0 ffffffff8147a7fc ffff881740f58f20
> Call Trace:
>  [<ffffffff81479e6d>] ? __schedule+0x16d/0xac0
>  [<ffffffff8147a7fc>] ? schedule+0x3c/0x90
>  [<ffffffff8147e71a>] ? schedule_hrtimeout_range_clock+0x10a/0x120
>  [<ffffffff8147d22e>] ? mutex_unlock+0xe/0x10
>  [<ffffffff811c839b>] ? ep_scan_ready_list+0x1db/0x1e0
>  [<ffffffff8147e743>] ? schedule_hrtimeout_range+0x13/0x20
>  [<ffffffff811c864a>] ? ep_poll+0x27a/0x3b0
>  [<ffffffff8108c540>] ? wake_up_q+0x70/0x70
>  [<ffffffff811c99a8>] ? SyS_epoll_wait+0xb8/0xd0
>  [<ffffffff8147f296>] ? entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x12/0x75
>  CPU: 0 PID: 10450 Comm: namex Tainted: G           O    4.4.65 #1
>  Hardware name: Insyde Purley/Type2 - Board Product Name1, BIOS 05.21.51.0036 07/19/2019
>   0000000000000000 ffff881ffe813c10 ffffffff8124e883 ffff881741c01000
>   ffff881ffe823980 ffff881ffe813c38 ffffffff810a7f7f ffff881ffe823980
>   000000007d2b7cd0 0000000000000001 ffff881ffe813c68 ffffffff810a80e0
>   Call Trace:
>   <#DB>  [<ffffffff8124e883>] dump_stack+0x85/0xc2
>   [<ffffffff810a7f7f>] spin_dump+0x7f/0x100
>   [<ffffffff810a80e0>] do_raw_spin_lock+0xa0/0x150
>   [<ffffffff8147eb55>] _raw_spin_lock+0x15/0x20
>   [<ffffffff8108c256>] try_to_wake_up+0x176/0x3d0
>   [<ffffffff8108c4c5>] wake_up_process+0x15/0x20
>   [<ffffffff8107b371>] insert_work+0x81/0xc0
>   [<ffffffff8107b4e5>] __queue_work+0x135/0x390
>   [<ffffffff8107b786>] queue_work_on+0x46/0x90
>   [<ffffffff81313d28>] kgdboc_post_exp_handler+0x48/0x70
>   [<ffffffff810ed488>] kgdb_cpu_enter+0x598/0x610
>   [<ffffffff810ed6e2>] kgdb_handle_exception+0xf2/0x1f0
>   [<ffffffff81054e21>] __kgdb_notify+0x71/0xd0
>   [<ffffffff81054eb5>] kgdb_notify+0x35/0x70
>   [<ffffffff81082e6a>] notifier_call_chain+0x4a/0x70
>   [<ffffffff8108304d>] notify_die+0x3d/0x50
>   [<ffffffff81017219>] do_int3+0x89/0x120
>   [<ffffffff81480fb4>] int3+0x44/0x80
> 
> Signed-off-by: LiuYe <liu.yeC@h3c.com>
> Co-authored-by: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>
> ---
>  drivers/tty/serial/kgdboc.c | 11 ++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/kgdboc.c b/drivers/tty/serial/kgdboc.c
> index 7ce7bb164..161b25ecc 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/kgdboc.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/kgdboc.c
> @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
>  #include <linux/module.h>
>  #include <linux/platform_device.h>
>  #include <linux/serial_core.h>
> +#include <linux/irq_work.h>
>  
>  #define MAX_CONFIG_LEN		40
>  
> @@ -99,10 +100,17 @@ static void kgdboc_restore_input_helper(struct work_struct *dummy)
>  
>  static DECLARE_WORK(kgdboc_restore_input_work, kgdboc_restore_input_helper);
>  
> +static void kgdboc_queue_restore_input_helper(struct irq_work *unused)
> +{
> +	schedule_work(&kgdboc_restore_input_work);
> +}
> +
> +static DEFINE_IRQ_WORK(kgdboc_restore_input_irq_work, kgdboc_queue_restore_input_helper);
> +
>  static void kgdboc_restore_input(void)
>  {
>  	if (likely(system_state == SYSTEM_RUNNING))
> -		schedule_work(&kgdboc_restore_input_work);
> +		irq_work_queue(&kgdboc_restore_input_irq_work);
>  }
>  
>  static int kgdboc_register_kbd(char **cptr)
> @@ -133,6 +141,7 @@ static void kgdboc_unregister_kbd(void)
>  			i--;
>  		}
>  	}
> +	irq_work_sync(&kgdboc_restore_input_irq_work);
>  	flush_work(&kgdboc_restore_input_work);
>  }
>  #else /* ! CONFIG_KDB_KEYBOARD */
> -- 
> 2.25.1
> 
> 

Hi,

This is the friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman.  You have sent him
a patch that has triggered this response.  He used to manually respond
to these common problems, but in order to save his sanity (he kept
writing the same thing over and over, yet to different people), I was
created.  Hopefully you will not take offence and will fix the problem
in your patch and resubmit it so that it can be accepted into the Linux
kernel tree.

You are receiving this message because of the following common error(s)
as indicated below:

- This looks like a new version of a previously submitted patch, but you
  did not list below the --- line any changes from the previous version.
  Please read the section entitled "The canonical patch format" in the
  kernel file, Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst for what
  needs to be done here to properly describe this.

If you wish to discuss this problem further, or you have questions about
how to resolve this issue, please feel free to respond to this email and
Greg will reply once he has dug out from the pending patches received
from other developers.

thanks,

greg k-h's patch email bot