Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 13:05:54 -0500
From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, neilb@suse.de, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org,
       linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] NLM: Initialize completion variable in lockd_up
Message-ID: <20080109130554.550ccde5@tleilax.poochiereds.net>
In-Reply-To: <20080109173542.GA30523@infradead.org>
References: <1199820798-5289-1-git-send-email-jlayton@redhat.com>
	<1199820798-5289-2-git-send-email-jlayton@redhat.com>
	<1199820798-5289-3-git-send-email-jlayton@redhat.com>
	<1199820798-5289-4-git-send-email-jlayton@redhat.com>
	<20080109173542.GA30523@infradead.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 781
Lines: 20

On Wed, 9 Jan 2008 17:35:42 +0000
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> wrote:

> I don't think we'll need lockd_start_done anymore after the kthread
> conversion.  When kthread_run returns the thread it created is
> guaranteed to have run until it scheduled away.
> 

Makes sense. My only concern is that we make sure this is behavior we
can count on in the future and not just an artifact of the current
kthread implementation. If that's the case, then I'll plan to remove it
on the next respin.

-- 
Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/