Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-110589-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.48.161 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.48.161;
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2024 19:32:11 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: Karel Balej <balejk@matfyz.cz>
Cc: Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-input@vger.kernel.org,
	Duje =?utf-8?Q?Mihanovi=C4=87?= <duje.mihanovic@skole.hr>,
	~postmarketos/upstreaming@lists.sr.ht, phone-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 2/5] mfd: add driver for Marvell 88PM886 PMIC
Message-ID: <f9ff03a0-377e-46ed-b7b1-2f10017a3b1f@sirena.org.uk>
References: <20240321162045.GC13211@google.com>
 <CZZL3MNOT0QG.2WDSNX9XD2RET@matfyz.cz>
 <879296b4-5186-4170-af3f-971787d28514@sirena.org.uk>
 <CZZLDK79D5VK.2VK3X59OHIY2Z@matfyz.cz>
 <45079e37-dde9-4310-a112-7af49f35ac77@sirena.org.uk>
 <CZZLVS3T3QIS.223XHI5OZ7UBG@matfyz.cz>
 <e9c7bd38-49cd-44c2-8842-292bc0b4205f@sirena.org.uk>
 <CZZMTZBZ5S7B.2HR8A6LEY08D4@matfyz.cz>
 <bd4e96b9-1026-469b-9884-073cde1f39dc@sirena.org.uk>
 <CZZO2EFTAKN2.246XG441ECYYK@matfyz.cz>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="lLalkpu8aLGWk2zM"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CZZO2EFTAKN2.246XG441ECYYK@matfyz.cz>


--lLalkpu8aLGWk2zM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 08:14:44PM +0100, Karel Balej wrote:
> Mark Brown, 2024-03-21T19:00:24+00:00:

> > I would expect that if you have two separate register maps they would
> > have separate configurations that describe the corresponding physical
> > register maps, as far as I can tell this driver is just making up a
> > maximum register number.

> Alright, so I should just use a separate config for each regmap and set
> the max_register value for each to whatever I can find is actually the
> highest used value in the downstream code -- correct?

That sounds plausible if you don't have any other information about the
register maps.

--lLalkpu8aLGWk2zM
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAmX8izsACgkQJNaLcl1U
h9AxyAf/ZKddewyBvi8stRYLa9VKzILgV3va7iA2wGRy5+HbwQi1sP2TV5cyvzGZ
Kuervgv5gAQ2mmFT4nGVjVdRwVaoDXlgjLVZ7AyA+ST/PZj3Z7VN1h/Nu9fFIuGT
0mcWYGGCACD2/6g4hd61VVj41r/PL3ZAXLQi477azLRoZHNOGWzl8H97NY14QMW6
hJzba3tTNCoDAQJkdC7BF+OZrx42l0mvQlrttLKeZumGiU33w2yuOiMgnejfmwJN
zCu4sqrftv3zzX/9q5kAvARdQJ8Tk3A7m79RrcxTZGrj7VsLBoDZ+UN+zBSeirsb
3C0TExKyX35FDNakR9pxN232X6UETQ==
=3Zwp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--lLalkpu8aLGWk2zM--