Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754951AbYAITyv (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Jan 2008 14:54:51 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752526AbYAITym (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Jan 2008 14:54:42 -0500 Received: from e6.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.146]:33411 "EHLO e6.ny.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752481AbYAITyl (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Jan 2008 14:54:41 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/10] x86: Unify percpu.h From: Dave Hansen To: Christoph Lameter Cc: travis@sgi.com, Andrew Morton , mingo@elte.hu, Andi Kleen , Jack Steiner , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Rusty Russell , tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com In-Reply-To: References: <20080108211023.923047000@sgi.com> <20080108211025.293924000@sgi.com> <1199906905.9834.101.camel@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2008 11:53:50 -0800 Message-Id: <1199908430.9834.104.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.10.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 762 Lines: 17 On Wed, 2008-01-09 at 11:31 -0800, Christoph Lameter wrote: > Well this is only the first patchset. The next one will unify this even > more (and make percpu functions work consistent between the two arches) > but it requires changes to the way the %gs register is used in > x86_64. So we only do the simplest thing here to have one file to patch > against later. Then I really think this particular patch belongs in that other patch set. Here, it makes very little sense, and it's on the end anyway. -- Dave -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/