Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 12:11:14 -0800 (PST)
From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
To: Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com>
cc: travis@sgi.com, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, mingo@elte.hu,
       Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>, Jack Steiner <steiner@sgi.com>,
       linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
       Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>, tglx@linutronix.de,
       mingo@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/10] x86: Unify percpu.h
In-Reply-To: <1199908430.9834.104.camel@localhost>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0801091210300.11709@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
References: <20080108211023.923047000@sgi.com>  <20080108211025.293924000@sgi.com>
 <1199906905.9834.101.camel@localhost>  <Pine.LNX.4.64.0801091130420.11317@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
 <1199908430.9834.104.camel@localhost>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 593
Lines: 14

On Wed, 9 Jan 2008, Dave Hansen wrote:

> Then I really think this particular patch belongs in that other patch
> set.  Here, it makes very little sense, and it's on the end anyway.

It makes sense in that both percpu_32/64 are very small as a result of 
earlier patches and so its justifiable to put them together to simplify 
the next patchset.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/