Received: by 2002:ab2:6857:0:b0:1ef:ffd0:ce49 with SMTP id l23csp1074571lqp; Fri, 22 Mar 2024 05:06:06 -0700 (PDT) X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=3; AJvYcCX+YEus7D44FlequvWmWzN0lCK8ucr24pIAE4ivevYKQSInE4Oy+wiMQYjTB+B83ltqtivc36glAfHK1idRDN8MoD+qWRGVtbDlHn6uiw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEkxhhsYoV+t2hDRWBpHwhpZ1XGimyLU0yyp6ylYOXyCKLmkStN4/K3fD5Bw+3aXFhPZS+a X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a21:9998:b0:1a3:6464:1154 with SMTP id ve24-20020a056a21999800b001a364641154mr2766849pzb.0.1711109165919; Fri, 22 Mar 2024 05:06:05 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; t=1711109165; cv=pass; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Mre8AF2jQ56Vj7iN7bw1cOjEJ1PTHMfRroVgyMvZ7DZw1adiqetyuFMPbCHVDLVZWu oXzluxDZyF81FMg4Iqbmq4/dLkjwrNzRw1CR0nlw8uaHp9zoXO0rHFsybRDErRiTxJpx qAmfypSZITZMvDt09vz5Oco5l/4cEvAF3irAa3EOcHEj86nzpUuD3j9PuNR2vwLraWe/ PhuOTsOTng5NdOFiv5cROGzDLXtVJmxKIO/UYy2yssoBssJX0Avm9dx4KcpxieS7gwLX vW2wvG/mcgX7N0Ak01JoRO0HP97vT6nPMN1e4B5wgyhPsrtcdDec3LIJtOppEkkKQSvb BfCw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:list-unsubscribe :list-subscribe:list-id:precedence:date:message-id; bh=54Bb7veIKv1s7ZownTS7dQiB8EYMGXLAYn0w825Ubvc=; fh=F1ClEinnlwFlQVqrOAGwLkzWVMQIaLevZvWzuU2jPo0=; b=gRdilSn2RuXSoJHQwGfzDLp42igoxq+PIWqt0vtooj0euC7V79J3hIJtz/j1ARGEKE NMdga6eJ3aNxNHqya6z8zEVATXR2GdVmUl1kcY941ZdiEU+Sfxa+AQc0PIHFn61qw9gL +36hMJsMX3TSyBMvyjRNlHjAAr57jChYkityM5ecIOyemWFBmZ+fmT33/C/RDEp+Angp nF20nzp7AaTVRvqhEJ2etCd/PNQWcGz0yBn890IqwFA1uTZSyZfrkiak0dmcMaEYWcEJ 5IUYmnjligUHhi+vDv4q35Ckve0LQUj27c5wi3QAm/deSBeWvQvEemFJwdreFqp7uX5+ A4bQ==; dara=google.com ARC-Authentication-Results: i=2; mx.google.com; arc=pass (i=1 spf=pass spfdomain=huawei.com dmarc=pass fromdomain=huawei.com); spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-111401-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45e3:2400::1 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-111401-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org"; dmarc=fail (p=QUARANTINE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=huawei.com Return-Path: Received: from sv.mirrors.kernel.org (sv.mirrors.kernel.org. [2604:1380:45e3:2400::1]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id o25-20020a056a001b5900b006ea74c8d7a0si1765356pfv.119.2024.03.22.05.06.05 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 22 Mar 2024 05:06:05 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-111401-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45e3:2400::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45e3:2400::1; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; arc=pass (i=1 spf=pass spfdomain=huawei.com dmarc=pass fromdomain=huawei.com); spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-111401-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45e3:2400::1 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-111401-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org"; dmarc=fail (p=QUARANTINE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=huawei.com Received: from smtp.subspace.kernel.org (wormhole.subspace.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by sv.mirrors.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0ADED286731 for ; Fri, 22 Mar 2024 12:06:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DFC93FBA4; Fri, 22 Mar 2024 12:06:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from szxga06-in.huawei.com (szxga06-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.32]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4318F3F8E2 for ; Fri, 22 Mar 2024 12:05:55 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.249.212.32 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1711109160; cv=none; b=F6/Y6sMTJ6UsvY6V135IoGwSNWEm3A5W6sp6Ng+x2t3/AcJraBo8pQmpcoJkc+R8GygmRzXfyqaVzww0b4QiPe4PQdE3HLNhjwKtdVOZe/tlvCE/J7N99YWy3k1OPbvYarups8Vo+Ylj99Nn1to2V60GWKYtx7SAuXy8WybqAHU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1711109160; c=relaxed/simple; bh=pMbc+LFVvwia6QjhbP1e5dR9TNeCQW2V9LN/n0Lo9Mc=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:CC:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=tKSrzIDI7FVaNhtLeKir9ncqZUg5y5W6hem121j/oH5GWmKO490Aj4P8lvVJf0TmXTPTxmSvTNq0VMgOmoCh/vVRUBk9oYMGYS0PFkZ93mY+xVIIRwbLHnd2yPiETfEH8P53WGl5gCfIXl8Tl9FOpBmvXuYf8uxRAMuuacN3Oe0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.249.212.32 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.19.163.44]) by szxga06-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4V1Lbh0jq0z1vx5c; Fri, 22 Mar 2024 20:04:32 +0800 (CST) Received: from kwepemd500012.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.221.188.25]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3EEC5140383; Fri, 22 Mar 2024 20:05:19 +0800 (CST) Received: from [10.67.111.176] (10.67.111.176) by kwepemd500012.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.25) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.1258.28; Fri, 22 Mar 2024 20:05:18 +0800 Message-ID: Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2024 20:05:18 +0800 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.3.0 Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 4/5] ubifs: Introduce ACLs mount options Content-Language: en-US To: Zhihao Cheng , CC: , References: <20240319161646.2153867-1-lizetao1@huawei.com> <20240319161646.2153867-5-lizetao1@huawei.com> From: Li Zetao In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-ClientProxiedBy: dggpeml100005.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.185) To kwepemd500012.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.25) Hi, On 2024/3/21 14:49, Zhihao Cheng wrote: > 在 2024/3/20 0:16, Li Zetao 写道: >> Implement the ability to enable or disable the ACLs feature through >> mount options. "-o acl" option means enable and "-o noacl" means disable >> and it is enable by default. >> >> Signed-off-by: Li Zetao >> --- >>   fs/ubifs/super.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>   fs/ubifs/ubifs.h |  2 ++ >>   2 files changed, 42 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/fs/ubifs/super.c b/fs/ubifs/super.c >> index 7f4031a15f4d..ed03bf11e51d 100644 >> --- a/fs/ubifs/super.c >> +++ b/fs/ubifs/super.c >> @@ -457,6 +457,13 @@ static int ubifs_show_options(struct seq_file *s, >> struct dentry *root) >>       seq_printf(s, ",assert=%s", ubifs_assert_action_name(c)); >>       seq_printf(s, ",ubi=%d,vol=%d", c->vi.ubi_num, c->vi.vol_id); >> +#ifdef CONFIG_UBIFS_FS_POSIX_ACL > > This config is introduced in pacth 5, we cannot use it in patch 4. >> +    if (c->mount_opts.acl == 2) >> +        seq_puts(s, ",acl"); >> +    else if (c->mount_opts.acl == 1) >> +        seq_puts(s, ",noacl"); >> +#endif >> + >>       return 0; >>   } >> @@ -967,6 +974,8 @@ static int check_volume_empty(struct ubifs_info *c) >>    * Opt_assert: set ubifs_assert() action >>    * Opt_auth_key: The key name used for authentication >>    * Opt_auth_hash_name: The hash type used for authentication >> + * Opt_acl: enable posix acl >> + * Opt_noacl: disable posix acl >>    * Opt_err: just end of array marker >>    */ >>   enum { >> @@ -981,6 +990,8 @@ enum { >>       Opt_auth_key, >>       Opt_auth_hash_name, >>       Opt_ignore, >> +    Opt_acl, >> +    Opt_noacl, > It would be better to update Documentation/filesystems/ubifs.rst to > describe new mount options Ok. >>       Opt_err, >>   }; >> @@ -997,6 +1008,8 @@ static const match_table_t tokens = { >>       {Opt_ignore, "ubi=%s"}, >>       {Opt_ignore, "vol=%s"}, >>       {Opt_assert, "assert=%s"}, >> +    {Opt_acl, "acl"}, >> +    {Opt_noacl, "noacl"}, >>       {Opt_err, NULL}, >>   }; >> @@ -1137,6 +1150,23 @@ static int ubifs_parse_options(struct >> ubifs_info *c, char *options, >>               break; >>           case Opt_ignore: >>               break; >> +#ifdef CONFIG_UBIFS_FS_POSIX_ACL >> +        case Opt_acl: >> +            c->mount_opts.acl = 2; >> +            c->vfs_sb->s_flags |= SB_POSIXACL; >> +            break; >> +        case Opt_noacl: >> +            c->mount_opts.acl = 1; >> +            c->vfs_sb->s_flags &= ~SB_POSIXACL; >> +            break; >> +#else >> +        case Opt_acl: >> +            ubifs_err(c, "acl options not supported"); >> +            return -EINVAL; >> +        case Opt_noacl: >> +            ubifs_err(c, "noacl options not supported"); >> +            return -EINVAL; >> +#endif >>           default: >>           { >>               unsigned long flag; >> @@ -2011,12 +2041,17 @@ static int ubifs_remount_fs(struct super_block >> *sb, int *flags, char *data) >>       sync_filesystem(sb); >>       dbg_gen("old flags %#lx, new flags %#x", sb->s_flags, *flags); >> +    c->mount_opts.acl = 0; >>       err = ubifs_parse_options(c, data, 1); > > 1. mount -onoacl /dev/ubi0_0 /mnt # After that, mount will show 'noacl' > option > 2. mount -oremount,xxx /dev/ubi0_0 /mnt > If 'xxx' has nothing to do with acl, c->mount_opts.acl is set as '0'. > Then superblock flag is assigned with 'SB_POSIXACL' and mount will not > display 'nocal'. Will it make user confused? I have tested this use case and it works fine. This is because the mount options will be re-parsed during remount, just like the last mount. But this is indeed redundant. I adjusted it to make it more reasonable. >>       if (err) { >>           ubifs_err(c, "invalid or unknown remount parameter"); >>           return err; >>       } >> +#ifdef CONFIG_UBIFS_FS_POSIX_ACL >> +    if (!c->mount_opts.acl) >> +        c->vfs_sb->s_flags |= SB_POSIXACL; >> +#endif >>       if (c->ro_mount && !(*flags & SB_RDONLY)) { >>           if (c->ro_error) { >>               ubifs_msg(c, "cannot re-mount R/W due to prior errors"); >> @@ -2197,6 +2232,11 @@ static int ubifs_fill_super(struct super_block >> *sb, void *data, int silent) >>       if (err) >>           goto out_close; >> +#ifdef CONFIG_UBIFS_FS_POSIX_ACL >> +    if (!c->mount_opts.acl) >> +        c->vfs_sb->s_flags |= SB_POSIXACL; >> +#endif >> + >>       /* >>        * UBIFS provides 'backing_dev_info' in order to disable >> read-ahead. For >>        * UBIFS, I/O is not deferred, it is done immediately in >> read_folio, >> diff --git a/fs/ubifs/ubifs.h b/fs/ubifs/ubifs.h >> index b0d3b076290d..4a6078cbb2f5 100644 >> --- a/fs/ubifs/ubifs.h >> +++ b/fs/ubifs/ubifs.h >> @@ -956,6 +956,7 @@ struct ubifs_orphan { >>    *                  specified in @compr_type) >>    * @compr_type: compressor type to override the superblock >> compressor with >>    *              (%UBIFS_COMPR_NONE, etc) >> + * @acl: enable/disable posix acl (%0 default, %1 disable, %2 enable) >>    */ >>   struct ubifs_mount_opts { >>       unsigned int unmount_mode:2; >> @@ -963,6 +964,7 @@ struct ubifs_mount_opts { >>       unsigned int chk_data_crc:2; >>       unsigned int override_compr:1; >>       unsigned int compr_type:2; >> +    unsigned int acl:2; >>   }; >>   /** >> >