Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-111566-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1;
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2024 14:48:11 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	Ilpo =?iso-8859-1?Q?J=E4rvinen?= <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>,
	Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>,
	Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>,
	Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>,
	Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@inria.fr>,
	Lukas Wunner <lukas.wunner@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cleanup: Add usage and style documentation
Message-ID: <2024032200-outage-tribute-b630@gregkh>
References: <171097196970.1011049.9726486429680041876.stgit@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com>
 <8a1adff2-eb83-4dec-b8d0-1e523245de65@web.de>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <8a1adff2-eb83-4dec-b8d0-1e523245de65@web.de>

On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 02:00:42PM +0100, Markus Elfring wrote:
> …
> > +++ b/include/linux/cleanup.h
> > @@ -4,6 +4,118 @@
> >
> >  #include <linux/compiler.h>
> >
> > +/**
> > + * DOC: scope-based cleanup helpers
> > + *
> > + * The "goto error" pattern is notorious for introducing …
> 
> Will any other label become more helpful for this description approach?
> 
> 
> > + * this tedium and can aid in maintaining FILO (first in last out)
>              ⬆
> Would an other word be more appropriate here?
> 

Hi,

This is the semi-friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman.

Markus, you seem to have sent a nonsensical or otherwise pointless
review comment to a patch submission on a Linux kernel developer mailing
list.  I strongly suggest that you not do this anymore.  Please do not
bother developers who are actively working to produce patches and
features with comments that, in the end, are a waste of time.

Patch submitter, please ignore Markus's suggestion; you do not need to
follow it at all.  The person/bot/AI that sent it is being ignored by
almost all Linux kernel maintainers for having a persistent pattern of
behavior of producing distracting and pointless commentary, and
inability to adapt to feedback.  Please feel free to also ignore emails
from them.

thanks,

greg k-h's patch email bot