Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-112009-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45e3:2400::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45e3:2400::1;
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>, Linus Walleij
 <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>, Francisco Ayala Le Brun
 <francisco@videowindow.eu>, Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
 linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
 ulf.hansson@linaro.org, Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>, Mario
 Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>, "Rafael J. Wysocki"
 <rafael@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Bug report: probe of AMDI0040:00 failed with error -16
In-Reply-To: <CAJZ5v0hgWGWneAgqCxZ2L85nrM_7J7H1g042sA5tzz234BNUGw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAN-StX1HqWqi+YW=t+V52-38Mfp5fAz7YHx4aH-CQjgyNiKx3g@mail.gmail.com>
 <36198864-579e-41f0-baf6-917f0a7f4bfa@intel.com>
 <5767438.DvuYhMxLoT@kreacher> <5770245.DvuYhMxLoT@kreacher>
 <CACRpkdby5dY7j9=r_dq+at_sqFduJWo15zt4tj4fvhY-KgCUYg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAJZ5v0hgWGWneAgqCxZ2L85nrM_7J7H1g042sA5tzz234BNUGw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2024 21:07:09 +0100
Message-ID: <87frwighea.ffs@tglx>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, Mar 22 2024 at 15:49, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 3:28=E2=80=AFPM Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@lina=
roorg> wrote:
>> Uhhh I rather not, the other approach will cover the invariably recurring
>> instances of this, it will not be the last time we see something like th=
is.
>
> I'm not actually sure how likely this is.
>
> The ACPI SCI is generally heavy-wieght, so it is not shared very often
> (and I believe that there is a particular reason for sharing it with a
> GPIO chip) and this very well may be an exception.
>
>> We need tglx input on this, I could merge the patch below with some
>> big TODO to fix it properly if the discussion about the proper solution
>> takes too much time.
>>
>> But I rather not hack around with IRQs without tglx (or marcz, but he
>> got overloaded) input.
>
> Fair enough.
>
> I guess I'll post the first patch with a proper changelog next week
> and we'll see.

Yes please. The COND flag makes a lot of sense. Hacking around it in the
driver is just a bandaid.

Thanks,

        tglx