Received: by 2002:ab2:6857:0:b0:1ef:ffd0:ce49 with SMTP id l23csp1420956lqp; Fri, 22 Mar 2024 14:34:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=2; AJvYcCUCgb4Di4TAHzUx3WYlkN7eUbZfNVuTPOItQZSEyZviXrnDHgAPkJK9X6aWWKBhk5BjiA3JFNN+Utjejuf2YBJ0Ue3wFGHlLTtsrnJHlw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFB7fUT5Tej7b/F9Ttn7w3w2vir4W25LxQAqrSzUwhTa+r5Y2bz2D3GlrlBO/ScpqWhUo/Q X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a20:8f11:b0:1a3:b0ae:d72d with SMTP id b17-20020a056a208f1100b001a3b0aed72dmr976433pzk.6.1711143258712; Fri, 22 Mar 2024 14:34:18 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from sv.mirrors.kernel.org (sv.mirrors.kernel.org. [139.178.88.99]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id v1-20020a170903238100b001de256e5d6esi285290plh.534.2024.03.22.14.34.18 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 22 Mar 2024 14:34:18 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-112038-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 139.178.88.99 as permitted sender) client-ip=139.178.88.99; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=Af4gOK8W; arc=fail (body hash mismatch); spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-112038-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 139.178.88.99 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-112038-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org"; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: from smtp.subspace.kernel.org (wormhole.subspace.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by sv.mirrors.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5999828358D for ; Fri, 22 Mar 2024 21:34:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCE587FBCC; Fri, 22 Mar 2024 21:33:54 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="Af4gOK8W" Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E0E6C7FBBF for ; Fri, 22 Mar 2024 21:33:50 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1711143233; cv=none; b=fRsj1o2BkH2CmYQE3jZ/eQoL/NuGSiQ2hs5TUPF42Xgukni6X2ZVGXYHVxTO9savxnTREoL12iT+u0EgGgIenMPLWwEpZh/KGfTK2Zjiie23JYGb8s8CIlav1K/eG+hRK+QRycppLp1XQnzIOieKFy/qJ0JdOSa0ZkXBzSyAFCs= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1711143233; c=relaxed/simple; bh=PqzwJRGeA0m4c/OUT2r2CD8DOxmQIwZ0ypehS4LmR30=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:From:To:Cc:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=Zrn3F09l4Vn2IvXXZsUDG/JqOu+FJdt/MQgaN+Bq2xn2/rOVQc7ILRKT8NBhyM521gVgQnJY71WBJrMJtxB9tvVd99G211Kg8YKI0be9ENIlQccx6Qa/W4fWkARvd2D0tFAmCJElzP1xUQClWV9SKJRgn0EBsq+4GKvyU8B7k5Y= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=Af4gOK8W; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1711143229; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:autocrypt:autocrypt; bh=N0U+z4zSBh2A2zjh96RNC4QUW0B+ry8dBKnISC/lxOM=; b=Af4gOK8Wl6DhTF3i7GWpRdkHW8gUVWkwxMlivx9IY9SuRUA6q4ynGXcJvGz0fL3qAQ2u4a ksARwJFCClsCUGqeFmqyABLHZAKc7uaRd1bfINei3CCPH85VMAlVHcWb0uZscl+j8m98SS 5QNucTF4ChcFuoVMB9QU+LxPBXhSPOQ= Received: from mail-wm1-f70.google.com (mail-wm1-f70.google.com [209.85.128.70]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-597-41uTkuJxPB-qWy2wIBsS3w-1; Fri, 22 Mar 2024 17:33:48 -0400 X-MC-Unique: 41uTkuJxPB-qWy2wIBsS3w-1 Received: by mail-wm1-f70.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-40e53200380so12297985e9.3 for ; Fri, 22 Mar 2024 14:33:48 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1711143227; x=1711748027; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:organization:autocrypt :references:cc:to:from:content-language:subject:user-agent :mime-version:date:message-id:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=N0U+z4zSBh2A2zjh96RNC4QUW0B+ry8dBKnISC/lxOM=; b=uRCCFEo7Eh+Xmntm/hggewVoMypJg72G5FyEEktx/lKA6HYIHGy5T+oJHDaFYqWEn5 YBiwDrPGNq3BhMd9rGfRh18Qn0TzuIWmiZjml8qP6npBTURXXH15s6jVfpZ3CgPzmjEv lvcYtxbMf/bO3QNd837NSccBsH+wR3j44QfLdEHzvP0AvLsb2riqHYfV3o9PgnZsJWSg dujo+oZn9u+Lkx57vv2aJaYCuAqStU5q/d2pGWo66aY5lpOXpiCdk0/6tK85WLAaXLTn S9CvDo2OWFNDZQMrPn4ZXCty3Fe6IoStQxW6Jn6wMuKkWCo55JZCMokQBYXFhh6bmWDB /iFg== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCVJskgk77f1mF2LMlB3GNAtipmOu9WJwdCXSk3PnHDkWK9cAjBYg7gLZZ9o8ZX6B9Iqrel8NYjz4eBCq2FEYszqGnNrl0IBmYpcVuKm X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxlnyG7gaiTxZ5Udi76O5p9R0W6Zkpt4tuHq2HeNC7/OcYCs6Lw Qr+an4Y72nFLu7Pvhil1N7QoAEvngpX0VQnZivy5y1dEMziBrlnGLCkA6N8C5Gvo1Bgwfocod8D p3J0XzBhaySr9Zt/xa9ISvA0D+jLia4upH3VP4pMl1PDAYQujLtz9O5HbM2zZdA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:364a:b0:413:f4d0:c233 with SMTP id y10-20020a05600c364a00b00413f4d0c233mr387740wmq.35.1711143227183; Fri, 22 Mar 2024 14:33:47 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:364a:b0:413:f4d0:c233 with SMTP id y10-20020a05600c364a00b00413f4d0c233mr387727wmq.35.1711143226775; Fri, 22 Mar 2024 14:33:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPV6:2003:cb:c71b:7e00:9339:4017:7111:82d0? (p200300cbc71b7e0093394017711182d0.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [2003:cb:c71b:7e00:9339:4017:7111:82d0]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f10-20020a05600c4e8a00b00412e5f32591sm622002wmq.28.2024.03.22.14.33.45 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 22 Mar 2024 14:33:46 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2024 22:33:45 +0100 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request in fuse_copy_do Content-Language: en-US From: David Hildenbrand To: Miklos Szeredi Cc: xingwei lee , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, samsun1006219@gmail.com, syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com, linux-mm , Mike Rapoport References: <620f68b0-4fe0-4e3e-856a-dedb4bcdf3a7@redhat.com> <463612f2-5590-4fb3-8273-0d64c3fd3684@redhat.com> Autocrypt: addr=david@redhat.com; keydata= xsFNBFXLn5EBEAC+zYvAFJxCBY9Tr1xZgcESmxVNI/0ffzE/ZQOiHJl6mGkmA1R7/uUpiCjJ dBrn+lhhOYjjNefFQou6478faXE6o2AhmebqT4KiQoUQFV4R7y1KMEKoSyy8hQaK1umALTdL QZLQMzNE74ap+GDK0wnacPQFpcG1AE9RMq3aeErY5tujekBS32jfC/7AnH7I0v1v1TbbK3Gp XNeiN4QroO+5qaSr0ID2sz5jtBLRb15RMre27E1ImpaIv2Jw8NJgW0k/D1RyKCwaTsgRdwuK Kx/Y91XuSBdz0uOyU/S8kM1+ag0wvsGlpBVxRR/xw/E8M7TEwuCZQArqqTCmkG6HGcXFT0V9 PXFNNgV5jXMQRwU0O/ztJIQqsE5LsUomE//bLwzj9IVsaQpKDqW6TAPjcdBDPLHvriq7kGjt WhVhdl0qEYB8lkBEU7V2Yb+SYhmhpDrti9Fq1EsmhiHSkxJcGREoMK/63r9WLZYI3+4W2rAc UucZa4OT27U5ZISjNg3Ev0rxU5UH2/pT4wJCfxwocmqaRr6UYmrtZmND89X0KigoFD/XSeVv jwBRNjPAubK9/k5NoRrYqztM9W6sJqrH8+UWZ1Idd/DdmogJh0gNC0+N42Za9yBRURfIdKSb B3JfpUqcWwE7vUaYrHG1nw54pLUoPG6sAA7Mehl3nd4pZUALHwARAQABzSREYXZpZCBIaWxk ZW5icmFuZCA8ZGF2aWRAcmVkaGF0LmNvbT7CwZgEEwEIAEICGwMGCwkIBwMCBhUIAgkKCwQW AgMBAh4BAheAAhkBFiEEG9nKrXNcTDpGDfzKTd4Q9wD/g1oFAl8Ox4kFCRKpKXgACgkQTd4Q 9wD/g1oHcA//a6Tj7SBNjFNM1iNhWUo1lxAja0lpSodSnB2g4FCZ4R61SBR4l/psBL73xktp rDHrx4aSpwkRP6Epu6mLvhlfjmkRG4OynJ5HG1gfv7RJJfnUdUM1z5kdS8JBrOhMJS2c/gPf wv1TGRq2XdMPnfY2o0CxRqpcLkx4vBODvJGl2mQyJF/gPepdDfcT8/PY9BJ7FL6Hrq1gnAo4 3Iv9qV0JiT2wmZciNyYQhmA1V6dyTRiQ4YAc31zOo2IM+xisPzeSHgw3ONY/XhYvfZ9r7W1l pNQdc2G+o4Di9NPFHQQhDw3YTRR1opJaTlRDzxYxzU6ZnUUBghxt9cwUWTpfCktkMZiPSDGd KgQBjnweV2jw9UOTxjb4LXqDjmSNkjDdQUOU69jGMUXgihvo4zhYcMX8F5gWdRtMR7DzW/YE BgVcyxNkMIXoY1aYj6npHYiNQesQlqjU6azjbH70/SXKM5tNRplgW8TNprMDuntdvV9wNkFs 9TyM02V5aWxFfI42+aivc4KEw69SE9KXwC7FSf5wXzuTot97N9Phj/Z3+jx443jo2NR34XgF 89cct7wJMjOF7bBefo0fPPZQuIma0Zym71cP61OP/i11ahNye6HGKfxGCOcs5wW9kRQEk8P9 M/k2wt3mt/fCQnuP/mWutNPt95w9wSsUyATLmtNrwccz63XOwU0EVcufkQEQAOfX3n0g0fZz Bgm/S2zF/kxQKCEKP8ID+Vz8sy2GpDvveBq4H2Y34XWsT1zLJdvqPI4af4ZSMxuerWjXbVWb T6d4odQIG0fKx4F8NccDqbgHeZRNajXeeJ3R7gAzvWvQNLz4piHrO/B4tf8svmRBL0ZB5P5A 2uhdwLU3NZuK22zpNn4is87BPWF8HhY0L5fafgDMOqnf4guJVJPYNPhUFzXUbPqOKOkL8ojk CXxkOFHAbjstSK5Ca3fKquY3rdX3DNo+EL7FvAiw1mUtS+5GeYE+RMnDCsVFm/C7kY8c2d0G NWkB9pJM5+mnIoFNxy7YBcldYATVeOHoY4LyaUWNnAvFYWp08dHWfZo9WCiJMuTfgtH9tc75 7QanMVdPt6fDK8UUXIBLQ2TWr/sQKE9xtFuEmoQGlE1l6bGaDnnMLcYu+Asp3kDT0w4zYGsx 5r6XQVRH4+5N6eHZiaeYtFOujp5n+pjBaQK7wUUjDilPQ5QMzIuCL4YjVoylWiBNknvQWBXS lQCWmavOT9sttGQXdPCC5ynI+1ymZC1ORZKANLnRAb0NH/UCzcsstw2TAkFnMEbo9Zu9w7Kv AxBQXWeXhJI9XQssfrf4Gusdqx8nPEpfOqCtbbwJMATbHyqLt7/oz/5deGuwxgb65pWIzufa N7eop7uh+6bezi+rugUI+w6DABEBAAHCwXwEGAEIACYCGwwWIQQb2cqtc1xMOkYN/MpN3hD3 AP+DWgUCXw7HsgUJEqkpoQAKCRBN3hD3AP+DWrrpD/4qS3dyVRxDcDHIlmguXjC1Q5tZTwNB boaBTPHSy/Nksu0eY7x6HfQJ3xajVH32Ms6t1trDQmPx2iP5+7iDsb7OKAb5eOS8h+BEBDeq 3ecsQDv0fFJOA9ag5O3LLNk+3x3q7e0uo06XMaY7UHS341ozXUUI7wC7iKfoUTv03iO9El5f XpNMx/YrIMduZ2+nd9Di7o5+KIwlb2mAB9sTNHdMrXesX8eBL6T9b+MZJk+mZuPxKNVfEQMQ a5SxUEADIPQTPNvBewdeI80yeOCrN+Zzwy/Mrx9EPeu59Y5vSJOx/z6OUImD/GhX7Xvkt3kq Er5KTrJz3++B6SH9pum9PuoE/k+nntJkNMmQpR4MCBaV/J9gIOPGodDKnjdng+mXliF3Ptu6 3oxc2RCyGzTlxyMwuc2U5Q7KtUNTdDe8T0uE+9b8BLMVQDDfJjqY0VVqSUwImzTDLX9S4g/8 kC4HRcclk8hpyhY2jKGluZO0awwTIMgVEzmTyBphDg/Gx7dZU1Xf8HFuE+UZ5UDHDTnwgv7E th6RC9+WrhDNspZ9fJjKWRbveQgUFCpe1sa77LAw+XFrKmBHXp9ZVIe90RMe2tRL06BGiRZr jPrnvUsUUsjRoRNJjKKA/REq+sAnhkNPPZ/NNMjaZ5b8Tovi8C0tmxiCHaQYqj7G2rgnT0kt WNyWQQ== Organization: Red Hat In-Reply-To: <463612f2-5590-4fb3-8273-0d64c3fd3684@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 22.03.24 22:18, David Hildenbrand wrote: > On 22.03.24 22:13, Miklos Szeredi wrote: >> On Fri, 22 Mar 2024 at 22:08, David Hildenbrand wrote: >>> >>> On 22.03.24 20:46, Miklos Szeredi wrote: >>>> On Fri, 22 Mar 2024 at 16:41, David Hildenbrand wrote: >>>> >>>>> But at least the vmsplice() just seems to work. Which is weird, because >>>>> GUP-fast should not apply (page not faulted in?) >>>> >>>> But it is faulted in, and that indeed seems to be the root cause. >>> >>> secretmem mmap() won't populate the page tables. So it's not faulted in yet. >>> >>> When we GUP via vmsplice, GUP-fast should not find it in the page tables >>> and fallback to slow GUP. >>> >>> There, we seem to pass check_vma_flags(), trigger faultin_page() to >>> fault it in, and then find it via follow_page_mask(). >>> >>> ... and I wonder how we manage to skip check_vma_flags(), or otherwise >>> managed to GUP it. >>> >>> vmsplice() should, in theory, never succeed here. >>> >>> Weird :/ >>> >>>> Improved repro: >>>> >>>> #define _GNU_SOURCE >>>> >>>> #include >>>> #include >>>> #include >>>> #include >>>> #include >>>> #include >>>> >>>> int main(void) >>>> { >>>> int fd1, fd2; >>>> int pip[2]; >>>> struct iovec iov; >>>> char *addr; >>>> int ret; >>>> >>>> fd1 = syscall(__NR_memfd_secret, 0); >>>> addr = mmap(NULL, 4096, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED, fd1, 0); >>>> ftruncate(fd1, 7); >>>> addr[0] = 1; /* fault in page */ >> >> Here the page is faulted in and GUP-fast will find it. It's not in >> the kernel page table, but it is in the user page table, which is what >> matter for GUP. > > Trust me, I know the GUP code very well :P > > gup_pte_range -- GUP fast -- contains: > > if (unlikely(folio_is_secretmem(folio))) { > gup_put_folio(folio, 1, flags); > goto pte_unmap; > } > > So we "should" be rejecting any secretmem folios and fallback to GUP slow. > > > ... we don't check the same in gup_huge_pmd(), but we shouldn't ever see > THP in secretmem code. > Ehm: [ 29.441405] Secretmem fault: PFN: 1096177 [ 29.442092] GUP-fast: PFN: 1096177 .. is folio_is_secretmem() broken? .. is it something "obvious" like: diff --git a/include/linux/secretmem.h b/include/linux/secretmem.h index 35f3a4a8ceb1e..6996f1f53f147 100644 --- a/include/linux/secretmem.h +++ b/include/linux/secretmem.h @@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ static inline bool folio_is_secretmem(struct folio *folio) * We know that secretmem pages are not compound and LRU so we can * save a couple of cycles here. */ - if (folio_test_large(folio) || !folio_test_lru(folio)) + if (folio_test_large(folio) || folio_test_lru(folio)) return false; mapping = (struct address_space *) -- Cheers, David / dhildenb