Received: by 2002:ab2:6857:0:b0:1ef:ffd0:ce49 with SMTP id l23csp1659226lqp; Sat, 23 Mar 2024 03:49:05 -0700 (PDT) X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=2; AJvYcCXXPNQCMMY/bi8Y/fd+i+PEnHqiEhpRKq+3dARWIlYjLPSDExLsqcuSoCMTzZGsjC9Fca9U/s3HHdePZI4I+AMcywjX0QZl7ZVX9l1DkA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFw9YqBzLCdwC9gfCdwiWA3bsZEAOFSmq25WXNm48tobKdE331MWJRwB6dRtQZJvkJjTlsa X-Received: by 2002:a05:6358:784:b0:17e:bae0:fe95 with SMTP id n4-20020a056358078400b0017ebae0fe95mr2565233rwj.7.1711190944999; Sat, 23 Mar 2024 03:49:04 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from sy.mirrors.kernel.org (sy.mirrors.kernel.org. [147.75.48.161]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id q6-20020a17090ad38600b0029b948f63f8si7405081pju.56.2024.03.23.03.49.04 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 23 Mar 2024 03:49:04 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-112302-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.48.161 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.48.161; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@chromium.org header.s=google header.b=exNiKUgk; arc=fail (body hash mismatch); spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-112302-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.48.161 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-112302-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org"; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=chromium.org Received: from smtp.subspace.kernel.org (wormhole.subspace.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by sy.mirrors.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A9931B21737 for ; Sat, 23 Mar 2024 10:49:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C76B3D0D0; Sat, 23 Mar 2024 10:48:11 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=chromium.org header.i=@chromium.org header.b="exNiKUgk" Received: from mail-qt1-f172.google.com (mail-qt1-f172.google.com [209.85.160.172]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 033B81798E for ; Sat, 23 Mar 2024 10:48:07 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.160.172 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1711190889; cv=none; b=GAHnJZqFvI7qZOUQ4AMMG2cV8YpEcgLTJzoGxXuxMOEwAY9wRKpyEJZGc+BEBJtVlD6JPB0JQfLRi768cp34mxP4sSCR73j/7tgod53iTYNAPT/2Cd58cRbRqh4ZLoIQdqF91z4LAy0jF8FMbneseQWUYxoda1ZVS1Buzd+VhR8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1711190889; c=relaxed/simple; bh=2J+19GA36C3nuOsP8fOrVXxQYN5UxCEC69hOZuSlfsA=; h=From:Date:Subject:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Message-Id:References: In-Reply-To:To:Cc; b=RTcly/Y1/rJzev2EdYa+hzTU7MTHWrOy9t2fJiWAbOsf43s7noxrZ8Q4sAbIOsraVI9U1Pyrvr8ZmUTXTuq21/48HwAlke9AQdZQM7cWruwHJrkq+eCJXccf6rDmTIRt8rnUjwVYkRZi7IUkaeYAaY5lbKvSpUphFDqeCd1JFpg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=chromium.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=chromium.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=chromium.org header.i=@chromium.org header.b=exNiKUgk; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.160.172 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=chromium.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=chromium.org Received: by mail-qt1-f172.google.com with SMTP id d75a77b69052e-430c63d4da9so22230911cf.0 for ; Sat, 23 Mar 2024 03:48:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chromium.org; s=google; t=1711190887; x=1711795687; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=cc:to:in-reply-to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding :mime-version:subject:date:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=7bd6fdlI9ivmm+oqWJlfdPWn+cEoU+QJKRh2PjxHjMI=; b=exNiKUgkPVeJrVZRMYqon4vzAixCLq40/VYRx00XxuG2Xwanvxutu+JTsFoWxs6xY0 8URdQIuEr7la+xsOtkqB0iA94F5kXIAt8nx3Mn4gHCxB8DHCneoZt40NiWHSTRDLVFvH fx6V1KaLsDYk9yplOWIxu2KyK5XNDBaBomrq8= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1711190887; x=1711795687; h=cc:to:in-reply-to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding :mime-version:subject:date:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=7bd6fdlI9ivmm+oqWJlfdPWn+cEoU+QJKRh2PjxHjMI=; b=XUFCXWOf8bA1BQJvznopx+4FlwkyB7BW7r96yWaJaVdyh4slgkBmxW423ESaI3JffR /tLH+WPi/n6PcuCaRZHKxPhNxeNIfDUTJbdBUbtoynEsB1wVGUyABd76//8UqckucxEI bpmPsvxlbncx+4CGQM4ik6QjZbh5p7Rgbzyfe9s7ougOjDaKtZckF75jT6h3DqQjud6/ ekuSSbaSsuijrZ2gskNygrAd5HRquzoJLJBjlv+7MrwNPOV727F3zab9dM///Dc7wAO/ 3NqN/HVYHJims3YuIkbNV3AB1NrZhwKe1StwXz4k7eSzGutIJEUFEcGPyIkCT8jN/bPm td0Q== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCW4tim82zHCf9eTNt6w4poKJkSWhPAqa1yeSPzQoto7NFdWxaphmvEM1MU/kfJybpGSx3Fz8mJrjvluNaXRiqkMWlncCsC0QLvHSqo1 X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxJ3KUa7tVaUHgFO4sA5JvOJ0kD14rqxbicuX/OIZu6j6QBYM4j rXXRJy2zEC5sPmlUx3D/LMYp9SJW8SmX4mGhqqOlIoYdqdGyi/QSnFBKeOBV7w== X-Received: by 2002:ac8:5d10:0:b0:431:378d:afa with SMTP id f16-20020ac85d10000000b00431378d0afamr2514208qtx.34.1711190886913; Sat, 23 Mar 2024 03:48:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from denia.c.googlers.com (188.173.86.34.bc.googleusercontent.com. [34.86.173.188]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id gd14-20020a05622a5c0e00b0042f21fe66f7sm697213qtb.73.2024.03.23.03.48.05 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 23 Mar 2024 03:48:06 -0700 (PDT) From: Ricardo Ribalda Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2024 10:48:04 +0000 Subject: [PATCH v10 3/6] media: uvcvideo: Quirk for invalid dev_sof in Logitech C922 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20240323-resend-hwtimestamp-v10-3-b08e590d97c7@chromium.org> References: <20240323-resend-hwtimestamp-v10-0-b08e590d97c7@chromium.org> In-Reply-To: <20240323-resend-hwtimestamp-v10-0-b08e590d97c7@chromium.org> To: Laurent Pinchart , Mauro Carvalho Chehab Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "hn.chen" , Hans Verkuil , Ricardo Ribalda , Sergey Senozhatsky X-Mailer: b4 0.12.4 Logitech C922 internal SOF does not increases at a stable rate of 1kHz. This causes that the device_sof and the host_sof run at different rates, breaking the clock domain conversion algorithm. Eg: 30 (6) [-] none 30 614400 B 21.245557 21.395214 34.133 fps ts mono/SoE 31 (7) [-] none 31 614400 B 21.275327 21.427246 33.591 fps ts mono/SoE 32 (0) [-] none 32 614400 B 21.304739 21.459256 34.000 fps ts mono/SoE 33 (1) [-] none 33 614400 B 21.334324 21.495274 33.801 fps ts mono/SoE * 34 (2) [-] none 34 614400 B 21.529237 21.527297 5.130 fps ts mono/SoE * 35 (3) [-] none 35 614400 B 21.649416 21.559306 8.321 fps ts mono/SoE 36 (4) [-] none 36 614400 B 21.678789 21.595320 34.045 fps ts mono/SoE .. 99 (3) [-] none 99 614400 B 23.542226 23.696352 33.541 fps ts mono/SoE 100 (4) [-] none 100 614400 B 23.571578 23.728404 34.069 fps ts mono/SoE 101 (5) [-] none 101 614400 B 23.601425 23.760420 33.504 fps ts mono/SoE * 102 (6) [-] none 102 614400 B 23.798324 23.796428 5.079 fps ts mono/SoE * 103 (7) [-] none 103 614400 B 23.916271 23.828450 8.478 fps ts mono/SoE 104 (0) [-] none 104 614400 B 23.945720 23.860479 33.957 fps ts mono/SoE Instead of disabling completely the hardware timestamping for such hardware we take the assumption that the packet handling jitter is under 2ms and use the host_sof as dev_sof. We can think of the UVC hardware clock as a system with a coarse clock (the SOF) and a fine clock (the PTS). The coarse clock can be replaced with a clock on the same frequency, if the jitter of such clock is smaller than its sampling rate. That way we can save some of the precision of the fine clock. To probe this point we have run three experiments on the Logitech C922. On that experiment we run the camera at 33fps and we analyse the difference in msec between a frame and its predecessor. If we display the histogram of that value, a thinner histogram will mean a better meassurement. The results for: - original hw timestamp: https://ibb.co/D1HJJ4x - pure software timestamp: https://ibb.co/QC9MgVK - modified hw timestamp: https://ibb.co/8s9dBdk This bug in the camera firmware has been confirmed by the vendor. lsusb -v Bus 001 Device 044: ID 046d:085c Logitech, Inc. C922 Pro Stream Webcam Device Descriptor: bLength 18 bDescriptorType 1 bcdUSB 2.00 bDeviceClass 239 Miscellaneous Device bDeviceSubClass 2 bDeviceProtocol 1 Interface Association bMaxPacketSize0 64 idVendor 0x046d Logitech, Inc. idProduct 0x085c C922 Pro Stream Webcam bcdDevice 0.16 iManufacturer 0 iProduct 2 C922 Pro Stream Webcam iSerial 1 80B912DF bNumConfigurations 1 Reviewed-by: Sergey Senozhatsky Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart Signed-off-by: Ricardo Ribalda --- drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_driver.c | 9 +++++++++ drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_video.c | 11 +++++++++++ drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvcvideo.h | 1 + 3 files changed, 21 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_driver.c b/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_driver.c index bbd90123a4e76..723e6d5680c2e 100644 --- a/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_driver.c +++ b/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_driver.c @@ -2574,6 +2574,15 @@ static const struct usb_device_id uvc_ids[] = { .bInterfaceSubClass = 1, .bInterfaceProtocol = 0, .driver_info = UVC_INFO_QUIRK(UVC_QUIRK_RESTORE_CTRLS_ON_INIT) }, + /* Logitech HD Pro Webcam C922 */ + { .match_flags = USB_DEVICE_ID_MATCH_DEVICE + | USB_DEVICE_ID_MATCH_INT_INFO, + .idVendor = 0x046d, + .idProduct = 0x085c, + .bInterfaceClass = USB_CLASS_VIDEO, + .bInterfaceSubClass = 1, + .bInterfaceProtocol = 0, + .driver_info = UVC_INFO_QUIRK(UVC_QUIRK_INVALID_DEVICE_SOF) }, /* Chicony CNF7129 (Asus EEE 100HE) */ { .match_flags = USB_DEVICE_ID_MATCH_DEVICE | USB_DEVICE_ID_MATCH_INT_INFO, diff --git a/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_video.c b/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_video.c index b2e70fcf4eb4c..d6ca383f643e3 100644 --- a/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_video.c +++ b/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_video.c @@ -558,6 +558,17 @@ uvc_video_clock_decode(struct uvc_streaming *stream, struct uvc_buffer *buf, stream->clock.last_sof = dev_sof; host_sof = usb_get_current_frame_number(stream->dev->udev); + + /* + * On some devices, like the Logitech C922, the device SOF does not run + * at a stable rate of 1kHz. For those devices use the host SOF instead. + * In the tests performed so far, this improves the timestamp precision. + * This is probably explained by a small packet handling jitter from the + * host, but the exact reason hasn't been fully determined. + */ + if (stream->dev->quirks & UVC_QUIRK_INVALID_DEVICE_SOF) + dev_sof = host_sof; + time = uvc_video_get_time(); /* diff --git a/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvcvideo.h b/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvcvideo.h index 6fb0a78b1b009..cb9dd50bba8ac 100644 --- a/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvcvideo.h +++ b/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvcvideo.h @@ -73,6 +73,7 @@ #define UVC_QUIRK_FORCE_Y8 0x00000800 #define UVC_QUIRK_FORCE_BPP 0x00001000 #define UVC_QUIRK_WAKE_AUTOSUSPEND 0x00002000 +#define UVC_QUIRK_INVALID_DEVICE_SOF 0x00004000 /* Format flags */ #define UVC_FMT_FLAG_COMPRESSED 0x00000001 -- 2.44.0.396.g6e790dbe36-goog