Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-113543-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45e3:2400::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45e3:2400::1;
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Sibi Sankar <quic_sibis@quicinc.com>,
	Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
	Dhruva Gole <d-gole@ti.com>,
	Yipeng Zou <zouyipeng@huawei.com>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
	Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 6.8 652/715] cpufreq: Fix per-policy boost behavior on SoCs using cpufreq_boost_set_sw()
Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2024 18:33:51 -0400
Message-ID: <20240324223455.1342824-653-sashal@kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20240324223455.1342824-1-sashal@kernel.org>
References: <20240324223455.1342824-1-sashal@kernel.org>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

From: Sibi Sankar <quic_sibis@quicinc.com>

[ Upstream commit f37a4d6b4a2c77414e8b9d25dd5ee31537ce9b00 ]

In the existing code, per-policy flags don't have any impact i.e.
if cpufreq_driver boost is enabled and boost is disabled for one or
more of the policies, the cpufreq driver will behave as if boost is
enabled.

Fix this by incorporating per-policy boost flag in the policy->max
computation used in cpufreq_frequency_table_cpuinfo and setting the
default per-policy boost to mirror the cpufreq_driver boost flag.

Fixes: 218a06a79d9a ("cpufreq: Support per-policy performance boost")
Reported-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Dhruva Gole <d-gole@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Sibi Sankar <quic_sibis@quicinc.com>
Tested-by:Yipeng Zou <zouyipeng@huawei.com> <mailto:zouyipeng@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Yipeng Zou <zouyipeng@huawei.com> <mailto:zouyipeng@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c    | 18 ++++++++++++------
 drivers/cpufreq/freq_table.c |  2 +-
 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
index 44db4f59c4cc6..7d570b44777ac 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -644,14 +644,16 @@ static ssize_t store_local_boost(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
 	if (policy->boost_enabled == enable)
 		return count;
 
+	policy->boost_enabled = enable;
+
 	cpus_read_lock();
 	ret = cpufreq_driver->set_boost(policy, enable);
 	cpus_read_unlock();
 
-	if (ret)
+	if (ret) {
+		policy->boost_enabled = !policy->boost_enabled;
 		return ret;
-
-	policy->boost_enabled = enable;
+	}
 
 	return count;
 }
@@ -1419,6 +1421,9 @@ static int cpufreq_online(unsigned int cpu)
 			goto out_free_policy;
 		}
 
+		/* Let the per-policy boost flag mirror the cpufreq_driver boost during init */
+		policy->boost_enabled = cpufreq_boost_enabled() && policy_has_boost_freq(policy);
+
 		/*
 		 * The initialization has succeeded and the policy is online.
 		 * If there is a problem with its frequency table, take it
@@ -2755,11 +2760,12 @@ int cpufreq_boost_trigger_state(int state)
 
 	cpus_read_lock();
 	for_each_active_policy(policy) {
+		policy->boost_enabled = state;
 		ret = cpufreq_driver->set_boost(policy, state);
-		if (ret)
+		if (ret) {
+			policy->boost_enabled = !policy->boost_enabled;
 			goto err_reset_state;
-
-		policy->boost_enabled = state;
+		}
 	}
 	cpus_read_unlock();
 
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/freq_table.c b/drivers/cpufreq/freq_table.c
index c4d4643b6ca65..c17dc51a5a022 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/freq_table.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/freq_table.c
@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ int cpufreq_frequency_table_cpuinfo(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
 	cpufreq_for_each_valid_entry(pos, table) {
 		freq = pos->frequency;
 
-		if (!cpufreq_boost_enabled()
+		if ((!cpufreq_boost_enabled() || !policy->boost_enabled)
 		    && (pos->flags & CPUFREQ_BOOST_FREQ))
 			continue;
 
-- 
2.43.0