Received: by 10.223.164.202 with SMTP id h10csp4632183wrb; Wed, 29 Nov 2017 09:18:07 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMbEl05KkX4vFlx+DpxvbNcfY84/wPIHuGi51BAcFccJWFnH7i/9OEsur12N0Pgt2pZlBowa X-Received: by 10.159.214.146 with SMTP id n18mr3703809plp.310.1511975887554; Wed, 29 Nov 2017 09:18:07 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1511975887; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=uZzQIyn2BnIGuvLn+WETnK4UBzagSDvsIns3P0ctBUG0T4Tq4/HOM/nXGmsi7Gkk5w 1hscEADxjBa8GMfYnYHm64nHF/QvZAAkPV4Et9BAYErhxAKsGlYltDPCrbjD3TiuRFOM WmMDDBnVMqMT0Kl02CVsbby8/84wQGZeGohqEllnjutQzeFz/6fIPXAhO6XvLBe3h6G7 ABlVgNwtyTiWo+LFk47qDR3BPokEhbpHy5canAik7FFxC9K0u1e6TFzEEjbHFzIcw8R2 9FEs0Wkedcgw37YU2wEefB7dd4W06rbkfx3uWhBPu5J1c9XrLAWvOc54ovG9mdlocp7X RrNg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:to:subject:arc-authentication-results; bh=upEW8kr+xYowsJu4xkjRLZY+caDJ4OZ0ZcpBY7GMEwQ=; b=aLKuSrPzbBPFsXfYPdicA22G7eREUTpo6I5xus1ZxxtyJrSgCNpRZ5jk7y1AyAel2h gjD7vus168JDMvo+D7CnAyOaXFITkGadxP5/gbek/5zsyVHDT1r+0XfC5e3p0ZeKcPj6 1VL+rZ/S21A5NqzpvOjlh2HR809lOni74PCmTObDcJ74DG92YRftHXGhuucUq6vIXPjV o4ZVzCJXySokUQck3XLCkNxjkLvpiCySHNLxomZZ7FRhed2SpWYVZE3w4zH+qvmI1swH vX61y4oBsHaEo16TaRJKdzgC5RVRZmz2AR6n+fw8jNpUSeRsd458AXwMPtEoHSa5zTpT xwjA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id c26si1672360pfj.132.2017.11.29.09.17.56; Wed, 29 Nov 2017 09:18:07 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933984AbdK2RQV (ORCPT + 70 others); Wed, 29 Nov 2017 12:16:21 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:38422 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933829AbdK2RQS (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Nov 2017 12:16:18 -0500 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 760BA4E33B; Wed, 29 Nov 2017 17:16:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.36.117.214] (ovpn-117-214.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.117.214]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 753185D964; Wed, 29 Nov 2017 17:16:15 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] KVM: x86: Allow Qemu/KVM to use PVH entry point To: Maran Wilson , boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com, jgross@suse.com, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com, x86@kernel.org, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, roger.pau@citrix.com, rkrcmar@redhat.com, JBeulich@suse.com, andrew.cooper3@citrix.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org References: <1511897682-32060-1-git-send-email-maran.wilson@oracle.com> From: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2017 18:16:14 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.14 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.38]); Wed, 29 Nov 2017 17:16:18 +0000 (UTC) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 29/11/2017 18:14, Maran Wilson wrote: > That is one option. I guess this gets into a discussion about the QEMU > side of the upcoming patches that would follow ... > > I'm currently just initializing the CPU state in QEMU for testing since > there is such minimal (non Linux specific) setup that is required by the > ABI.  And (borrowing from the Intel clear container patches) that VM > setup is only performed when user selects the "nofw" option with the q35 > model. But yeah, if folks think it important to move all such machine > state initialization out of QEMU and into an option ROM, I can look into > coding it up that way for the QEMU patches. Yes, please do an option ROM. I'll take care of porting it to qboot. Thanks, Paolo From 1585412524440810546@xxx Wed Nov 29 14:53:25 +0000 2017 X-GM-THRID: 1585339868639162159 X-Gmail-Labels: Inbox,Category Forums,HistoricalUnread