Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] KVM: x86: Allow Qemu/KVM to use PVH entry point
To:     =?UTF-8?Q?Roger_Pau_Monn=c3=a9?= <roger.pau@citrix.com>,
        Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
References: <1511897682-32060-1-git-send-email-maran.wilson@oracle.com>
 <176188ca-51f9-ef12-6e93-46ab2d8b8cfc@suse.com>
 <20171129085044.kc3yqqdcw3zmp2k2@MacBook-Pro-de-Roger.local>
 <4d213199-ea65-4410-5b7a-63038215e380@oracle.com>
 <0162f2cd-2d9e-1c89-bb8e-7ac0089f0b3a@suse.com>
 <20171129141810.q3s3xflsflpjovdd@MacBook-Pro-de-Roger.local>
Cc:     Maran Wilson <maran.wilson@oracle.com>, tglx@linutronix.de,
        mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com, x86@kernel.org,
        xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        rkrcmar@redhat.com, JBeulich@suse.com, andrew.cooper3@citrix.com,
        pbonzini@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org
From:   Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
Message-ID: <96f9b4a5-7cb6-19c3-227d-8c48916d5969@oracle.com>
Date:   Wed, 29 Nov 2017 09:25:50 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/45.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20171129141810.q3s3xflsflpjovdd@MacBook-Pro-de-Roger.local>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On 11/29/2017 09:18 AM, Roger Pau Monn� wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 03:11:12PM +0100, Juergen Gross wrote:
>> On 29/11/17 15:03, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>>> On 11/29/2017 03:50 AM, Roger Pau Monn� wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 09:21:59AM +0100, Juergen Gross wrote:
>>>>> On 28/11/17 20:34, Maran Wilson wrote:
>>>>>> For certain applications it is desirable to rapidly boot a KVM virtual
>>>>>> machine. In cases where legacy hardware and software support within the
>>>>>> guest is not needed, Qemu should be able to boot directly into the
>>>>>> uncompressed Linux kernel binary without the need to run firmware.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There already exists an ABI to allow this for Xen PVH guests and the ABI is
>>>>>> supported by Linux and FreeBSD:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>    https://xenbits.xen.org/docs/unstable/misc/hvmlite.html
>>>> I would also add a link to:
>>>>
>>>> http://xenbits.xen.org/docs/unstable/hypercall/x86_64/include,public,arch-x86,hvm,start_info.h.html#Struct_hvm_start_info
>>>>
>>>>>> This PoC patch enables Qemu to use that same entry point for booting KVM
>>>>>> guests.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Even though the code is still PoC quality, I'm sending this as an RFC now
>>>>>> since there are a number of different ways the specific implementation
>>>>>> details can be handled. I chose a shared code path for Xen and KVM guests
>>>>>> but could just as easily create a separate code path that is advertised by
>>>>>> a different ELF note for KVM. There also seems to be some flexibility in
>>>>>> how the e820 table data is passed and how (or if) it should be identified
>>>>>> as e820 data. As a starting point, I've chosen the options that seem to
>>>>>> result in the smallest patch with minimal to no changes required of the
>>>>>> x86/HVM direct boot ABI.
>>>>> I like the idea.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'd rather split up the different hypervisor types early and use a
>>>>> common set of service functions instead of special casing xen_guest
>>>>> everywhere. This would make it much easier to support the KVM PVH
>>>>> boot without the need to configure the kernel with CONFIG_XEN.
>>>>>
>>>>> Another option would be to use the same boot path as with grub: set
>>>>> the boot params in zeropage and start at startup_32.
>>>> I think I prefer this approach since AFAICT it should allow for
>>>> greater code share with the common boot path.
>>> zeropage is x86/Linux-specific so we'd need some sort of firmware (like
>>> grub) between a hypervisor and Linux to convert hvm_start_info to
>>> bootparams.
>> qemu?

I think KVM folks didn't want to do this. I can't find the thread but I
believe it was somewhere during Clear Containers discussion. Paolo?


> But then it won't be using the PVH entry point, and would just use the
> native one?
>
> My understanding was that the PVH shim inside of Linux will prepare a
> zero-page when booted using the PVH entry point, and then jump into
> the native boot path.

Right, but that's not what Juergen's second option is. IIUIC with that
option Linux starts with zeropage already prepared. No shim in the kernel.

-boris


From 1585410741542669143@xxx Wed Nov 29 14:25:05 +0000 2017
X-GM-THRID: 1585339868639162159
X-Gmail-Labels: Inbox,Category Forums,HistoricalUnread