Received: by 10.223.164.202 with SMTP id h10csp4436729wrb; Wed, 29 Nov 2017 06:25:05 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMb5g2Fl9CEZLgiRR0z4zJum99cOoKa7cmZLiTAh737+p/GgrW+DFnyLFfyv5R2LhNboD9Tt X-Received: by 10.99.116.94 with SMTP id e30mr2960863pgn.59.1511965505366; Wed, 29 Nov 2017 06:25:05 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1511965505; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=vL5MrL0BGgfVEK3DDv6uKUbpBhzRNRiOWnqP5nV94s7hogCgpscYYNyTOBU+vaQdmR omDvm0Ft+Znh9WR3heNc8t4tDVt/90w/kJUnhqheZyeiHSUanKx76UVd2HGIpvmAgpNt rMTLVQp+vAYAYE0tTpPWIqfXaGqGapi0y7lo0lVJ0k6tb502PxKnuS3nZI/0YdFI7uvM sy89VA+qRTjUJB8VBPVe2PMC0QnjFhuTJK1PXoJ/RcY7A4bwbeUVudNOpYAwp4fwnLNc rM6/7jYVqEtBXdVBz3Vlg7jeNNnO5FMtQ99eXteYFAbXFX9BN9RDthaPt2Aj3HTie4+/ A7Vg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date :arc-authentication-results; bh=4pwah2Oo5xtNugW9H8y5VA+JhXfHpb4Qy5HxeZz1Ftg=; b=gd/spt46O72fMsg0qevVBC9SMakx1vM//TFuYLDho/3w1zfAERfkohOb+C1V4E//2X UaBdxRYRq9BMUGWD7zXvGqGFgLydyCGhth0PQHZ3Efdw2d8rZ0y8WztmAC7N9fXq/qoP v8FlGzWn1TMsXNIth/Wj2qhTVks7P7fL5S5arkrRG+hbkfDzDV/ba8ZaVCAe36wzbi0/ ej3KIIdLJomuHiaFluMMh+V78BvaYyTNGzM/Q/g3WxrzM+CIx5vxvGEJJCeHqH0Kk+4J XO29jmpp3wM1P1SLOv3cCL2FvsxRJoK+DIBmkF+W4um6pAnYOD15rRED8iNu2bxS0Iv2 y2Rw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 202si1329051pge.274.2017.11.29.06.24.55; Wed, 29 Nov 2017 06:25:05 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932196AbdK2OST (ORCPT + 70 others); Wed, 29 Nov 2017 09:18:19 -0500 Received: from smtp.eu.citrix.com ([185.25.65.24]:53285 "EHLO SMTP.EU.CITRIX.COM" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752727AbdK2OSQ (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Nov 2017 09:18:16 -0500 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.44,473,1505779200"; d="scan'208";a="63908180" Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2017 14:18:10 +0000 From: Roger Pau =?iso-8859-1?Q?Monn=E9?= To: Juergen Gross CC: Boris Ostrovsky , Maran Wilson , , , , , , , , , , , Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] KVM: x86: Allow Qemu/KVM to use PVH entry point Message-ID: <20171129141810.q3s3xflsflpjovdd@MacBook-Pro-de-Roger.local> References: <1511897682-32060-1-git-send-email-maran.wilson@oracle.com> <176188ca-51f9-ef12-6e93-46ab2d8b8cfc@suse.com> <20171129085044.kc3yqqdcw3zmp2k2@MacBook-Pro-de-Roger.local> <4d213199-ea65-4410-5b7a-63038215e380@oracle.com> <0162f2cd-2d9e-1c89-bb8e-7ac0089f0b3a@suse.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <0162f2cd-2d9e-1c89-bb8e-7ac0089f0b3a@suse.com> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20171027 X-ClientProxiedBy: AMSPEX02CAS01.citrite.net (10.69.22.112) To AMSPEX02CL02.citrite.net (10.69.22.126) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 03:11:12PM +0100, Juergen Gross wrote: > On 29/11/17 15:03, Boris Ostrovsky wrote: > > On 11/29/2017 03:50 AM, Roger Pau Monn� wrote: > >> On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 09:21:59AM +0100, Juergen Gross wrote: > >>> On 28/11/17 20:34, Maran Wilson wrote: > >>>> For certain applications it is desirable to rapidly boot a KVM virtual > >>>> machine. In cases where legacy hardware and software support within the > >>>> guest is not needed, Qemu should be able to boot directly into the > >>>> uncompressed Linux kernel binary without the need to run firmware. > >>>> > >>>> There already exists an ABI to allow this for Xen PVH guests and the ABI is > >>>> supported by Linux and FreeBSD: > >>>> > >>>> https://xenbits.xen.org/docs/unstable/misc/hvmlite.html > >> I would also add a link to: > >> > >> http://xenbits.xen.org/docs/unstable/hypercall/x86_64/include,public,arch-x86,hvm,start_info.h.html#Struct_hvm_start_info > >> > >>>> This PoC patch enables Qemu to use that same entry point for booting KVM > >>>> guests. > >>>> > >>>> Even though the code is still PoC quality, I'm sending this as an RFC now > >>>> since there are a number of different ways the specific implementation > >>>> details can be handled. I chose a shared code path for Xen and KVM guests > >>>> but could just as easily create a separate code path that is advertised by > >>>> a different ELF note for KVM. There also seems to be some flexibility in > >>>> how the e820 table data is passed and how (or if) it should be identified > >>>> as e820 data. As a starting point, I've chosen the options that seem to > >>>> result in the smallest patch with minimal to no changes required of the > >>>> x86/HVM direct boot ABI. > >>> I like the idea. > >>> > >>> I'd rather split up the different hypervisor types early and use a > >>> common set of service functions instead of special casing xen_guest > >>> everywhere. This would make it much easier to support the KVM PVH > >>> boot without the need to configure the kernel with CONFIG_XEN. > >>> > >>> Another option would be to use the same boot path as with grub: set > >>> the boot params in zeropage and start at startup_32. > >> I think I prefer this approach since AFAICT it should allow for > >> greater code share with the common boot path. > > > > zeropage is x86/Linux-specific so we'd need some sort of firmware (like > > grub) between a hypervisor and Linux to convert hvm_start_info to > > bootparams. > > qemu? But then it won't be using the PVH entry point, and would just use the native one? My understanding was that the PVH shim inside of Linux will prepare a zero-page when booted using the PVH entry point, and then jump into the native boot path. Roger. From 1585410480125748463@xxx Wed Nov 29 14:20:55 +0000 2017 X-GM-THRID: 1585339868639162159 X-Gmail-Labels: Inbox,Category Forums,HistoricalUnread