Received: by 10.223.164.202 with SMTP id h10csp4431502wrb; Wed, 29 Nov 2017 06:20:22 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMYMnSa2LV0MD40dQUku5Gcpv0Jbet1s/gSRgf4ygHzTwMyDTsr+tU9uChmOFl0UTV0u/qhg X-Received: by 10.84.235.10 with SMTP id o10mr3035447plk.155.1511965222419; Wed, 29 Nov 2017 06:20:22 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1511965222; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=t97G2b6KZIysZF6eVUK+Y0o7tE0tKif7ZRFEG1AzRlmqMVBdu6WqdsNBy2e6Mc3yAQ /a5Rqqls94aWDDOVTV73j89MbvBWzzkl7/PS5CzMBuzrMOIDDiT97ZsIGBxrXcb1XoQB CSU5volJy4tXSyWuoBjhnDTTZg6AEppI5i1BjwCoMx4xuE61pdUnbkqHUUqsW/yAvANn xZoVM9wj41AYAa/Zvy7/JCKSRzwHOpOV0cdnthSv7xByrDxAooDWwLQxYLh45rtmbrhV Cu1X79BuiNaGbJNO+CNU7JdgkXhZBp9/kTpC9PBJZzLDF7mXpcbqBAVsXZNsRzhml6Uk Hpvg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to :mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:cc:references:to :subject:arc-authentication-results; bh=6+/OeF5PaRy8o09qnYJsfRZIoTjPOYQ4RsqgtXagyPE=; b=sQivWsbpWbx9+UPgk9UyCOuCBHL5HuPf39Qke62DZ6TKGSqu0rrIvaHAbVyTYolLM4 Q6I0Iug/3FMVMj75rEONHyXYrXG2ULwc53EsjTL7v2YEBbJuy67oOjiJv+oxEA+4xvXS fW3dg0KpOkvhdFi/tDXKUzwuNHZwjAuGk18WNnP2ri3ub9acfcCHTlWZ4jM4JwEsFlMX virTpKPlr41ZWFsir6Cre59IOPQMFMfbOXqg92l0AHj4I4HWzuhT3kRHdXWlr28DtSdC SWPYoidZfSyT+O9rfKzLB2Q3v608LRv/Xyl0hW9fb+tZ8L9/TG8BJhBNarkU8+hmXXwB 5S0A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=oracle.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id b35si1340821plh.219.2017.11.29.06.20.12; Wed, 29 Nov 2017 06:20:22 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=oracle.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754819AbdK2OEB (ORCPT + 70 others); Wed, 29 Nov 2017 09:04:01 -0500 Received: from aserp1040.oracle.com ([141.146.126.69]:38614 "EHLO aserp1040.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752166AbdK2OEA (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Nov 2017 09:04:00 -0500 Received: from userv0021.oracle.com (userv0021.oracle.com [156.151.31.71]) by aserp1040.oracle.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.2/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.2) with ESMTP id vATE3WQ8009058 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 29 Nov 2017 14:03:33 GMT Received: from userv0121.oracle.com (userv0121.oracle.com [156.151.31.72]) by userv0021.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id vATE3WJB019854 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 29 Nov 2017 14:03:32 GMT Received: from abhmp0015.oracle.com (abhmp0015.oracle.com [141.146.116.21]) by userv0121.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.13.8) with ESMTP id vATE3Vmi009540; Wed, 29 Nov 2017 14:03:31 GMT Received: from bostrovs-us.us.oracle.com (/10.152.32.65) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Wed, 29 Nov 2017 06:03:31 -0800 Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] KVM: x86: Allow Qemu/KVM to use PVH entry point To: =?UTF-8?Q?Roger_Pau_Monn=c3=a9?= , Juergen Gross References: <1511897682-32060-1-git-send-email-maran.wilson@oracle.com> <176188ca-51f9-ef12-6e93-46ab2d8b8cfc@suse.com> <20171129085044.kc3yqqdcw3zmp2k2@MacBook-Pro-de-Roger.local> Cc: Maran Wilson , tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com, x86@kernel.org, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rkrcmar@redhat.com, JBeulich@suse.com, andrew.cooper3@citrix.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org From: Boris Ostrovsky Message-ID: <4d213199-ea65-4410-5b7a-63038215e380@oracle.com> Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2017 09:03:27 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20171129085044.kc3yqqdcw3zmp2k2@MacBook-Pro-de-Roger.local> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Source-IP: userv0021.oracle.com [156.151.31.71] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 11/29/2017 03:50 AM, Roger Pau Monn� wrote: > On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 09:21:59AM +0100, Juergen Gross wrote: >> On 28/11/17 20:34, Maran Wilson wrote: >>> For certain applications it is desirable to rapidly boot a KVM virtual >>> machine. In cases where legacy hardware and software support within the >>> guest is not needed, Qemu should be able to boot directly into the >>> uncompressed Linux kernel binary without the need to run firmware. >>> >>> There already exists an ABI to allow this for Xen PVH guests and the ABI is >>> supported by Linux and FreeBSD: >>> >>> https://xenbits.xen.org/docs/unstable/misc/hvmlite.html > I would also add a link to: > > http://xenbits.xen.org/docs/unstable/hypercall/x86_64/include,public,arch-x86,hvm,start_info.h.html#Struct_hvm_start_info > >>> This PoC patch enables Qemu to use that same entry point for booting KVM >>> guests. >>> >>> Even though the code is still PoC quality, I'm sending this as an RFC now >>> since there are a number of different ways the specific implementation >>> details can be handled. I chose a shared code path for Xen and KVM guests >>> but could just as easily create a separate code path that is advertised by >>> a different ELF note for KVM. There also seems to be some flexibility in >>> how the e820 table data is passed and how (or if) it should be identified >>> as e820 data. As a starting point, I've chosen the options that seem to >>> result in the smallest patch with minimal to no changes required of the >>> x86/HVM direct boot ABI. >> I like the idea. >> >> I'd rather split up the different hypervisor types early and use a >> common set of service functions instead of special casing xen_guest >> everywhere. This would make it much easier to support the KVM PVH >> boot without the need to configure the kernel with CONFIG_XEN. >> >> Another option would be to use the same boot path as with grub: set >> the boot params in zeropage and start at startup_32. > I think I prefer this approach since AFAICT it should allow for > greater code share with the common boot path. zeropage is x86/Linux-specific so we'd need some sort of firmware (like grub) between a hypervisor and Linux to convert hvm_start_info to bootparams. -boris From 1585391077045895036@xxx Wed Nov 29 09:12:31 +0000 2017 X-GM-THRID: 1585339868639162159 X-Gmail-Labels: Inbox,Category Forums,HistoricalUnread