Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Thu, 19 Oct 2017 13:44:09 -0700
From:   Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>
To:     Jesus Sanchez-Palencia <jesus.sanchez-palencia@intel.com>
Cc:     Richard Cochran <rcochran@linutronix.de>, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org,
        Andre Guedes <andre.guedes@intel.com>,
        Anna-Maria Gleixner <anna-maria@linutronix.de>,
        David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Henrik Austad <henrik@austad.us>,
        John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@intel.com>,
        "Briano, Ivan" <ivan.briano@intel.com>,
        Levi Pearson <levipearson@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC V1 net-next 0/6] Time based packet transmission
Message-ID: <20171019204409.vmkhii2vocum43l6@localhost>
References: <cover.1505719061.git.rcochran@linutronix.de>
 <743a4550-7344-5e73-bf6d-6ec368263ad9@intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <743a4550-7344-5e73-bf6d-6ec368263ad9@intel.com>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 03:18:55PM -0700, Jesus Sanchez-Palencia wrote:
> This is great. Just out of curiosity, were you using vlans on your tests?

No, just raw packets.  VLAN tags could be added trivially (in the
program), but that naturally avoids the kernel's VLAN code.

> I might try to reproduce them soon. I would appreciate if you could provide me
> with the scripts, please.

Ok, will do.

Thanks,
Richard

From 1581635988659042394@xxx Wed Oct 18 22:27:00 +0000 2017
X-GM-THRID: 1578862758281541719
X-Gmail-Labels: Inbox,Category Forums