Received: by 10.223.164.221 with SMTP id h29csp651901wrb; Thu, 26 Oct 2017 05:00:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABhQp+Sbnj0bKPoJrAHnj6py5lIR+qH9udWmHDNQfR+30MDyNtdXAzOfPnX3iDiyfD9CBZEvmsFZ X-Received: by 10.99.134.200 with SMTP id x191mr4647810pgd.86.1509019200027; Thu, 26 Oct 2017 05:00:00 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1509019199; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=MHlH4Z7BJGB2HF3uw2ngox/sCt/dkQ+aCsIt+bNLS/pnAQhsdsNkBYaU11PZ0sUE1f ZF8TT5pp8Y7b6YoZ9OTp5RiDGO58a2npTDAIbLp2r2/tr1R0BJll6gWkhyuLXmCDJRDx aNQ9xmj0tP2KiELxvj9c+yUqxLbWelLeJpI+jddpiFL/S4H0AliZHpqxc39HCRREusEx mBayFZoGXDRF/Ia3yNT4G0viXdY0fIHzRvvXKDrOWCuRIRUpp7lemLgquMxVq+i8ViKk L/O2qRjqdLARbskvjL34M72m5cwX6urwCHIpTMtKBCJMYPVhSftm5ycG6M7NxI3kExZL 17Ng== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject:dkim-signature :arc-authentication-results; bh=UQsB0ANNv9fw4h26TDWQyV+a8ujtHs3es5zC0W8RWEw=; b=qai3s8ZcoHxC9xf0ybVhKU8Eg1QahDSwGS4E5oIvkSxL1l+P8EuLd+801uQZQ4CsmE qUSzfPuXTrniGNXP/SbH3soGaNKsiEPfXUPNw0gBPQqhQtnbiY92GlvX0GC+o4RZNZZm 1M9MKcYB6Xl/KdkzztRH0DJ9s7L7AgLeC2jFHKu7LIkifsX2W/NKgQXYyBgWWaN/i/jU M5Sd8k5i7jhfFqgIFLToJKuTQGZNy8AjNhBcU33Mh4le5SGI4HxgzvFMixpZZHOOQ0VV Bb789Avpvag8OV0hzMDX26sELOrEPRtTCCnL3PhBeXPn0heh3EU8BS0TP4L3uCQgphkI gKFQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@ti.com header.s=ti-com-17Q1 header.b=IdAhba20; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=QUARANTINE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ti.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id e72si3566169pfm.35.2017.10.26.04.59.45; Thu, 26 Oct 2017 04:59:59 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@ti.com header.s=ti-com-17Q1 header.b=IdAhba20; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=QUARANTINE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ti.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751918AbdJZL7X (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 26 Oct 2017 07:59:23 -0400 Received: from fllnx210.ext.ti.com ([198.47.19.17]:60049 "EHLO fllnx210.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751520AbdJZL7V (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Oct 2017 07:59:21 -0400 Received: from dlelxv90.itg.ti.com ([172.17.2.17]) by fllnx210.ext.ti.com (8.15.1/8.15.1) with ESMTP id v9QBxDX2007241; Thu, 26 Oct 2017 06:59:13 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1509019153; bh=PAXAZtgLh/6SQrucnC6B+b7ENUVb2Gc7K8D2knHxvs4=; h=Subject:To:CC:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=IdAhba20g8pyhUFDi1dO+2QpjqFxIVBlyGBHEcZ72HiH3N2wAbbRRoAqYH8V1fb9t qsA+Jbcc1lmSuAi1drq2GvmbFKZCUgY9keW4SAK5eWn3VkGEC85gSR56q3UuUuw9YK Nri0WwUMFywUCuxhY/LRHkzy1TsqXgGepO2FhiNI= Received: from DLEE101.ent.ti.com (dlee101.ent.ti.com [157.170.170.31]) by dlelxv90.itg.ti.com (8.14.3/8.13.8) with ESMTP id v9QBxDac029454; Thu, 26 Oct 2017 06:59:13 -0500 Received: from DLEE113.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.24) by DLEE101.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.31) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P256) id 15.1.845.34; Thu, 26 Oct 2017 06:59:12 -0500 Received: from dflp32.itg.ti.com (10.64.6.15) by DLEE113.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.24) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_0, cipher=TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA) id 15.1.845.34 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 26 Oct 2017 06:59:12 -0500 Received: from [192.168.2.6] (ileax41-snat.itg.ti.com [10.172.224.153]) by dflp32.itg.ti.com (8.14.3/8.13.8) with ESMTP id v9QBxBvs018146; Thu, 26 Oct 2017 06:59:11 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCHv1 00/14] omapdrm: DSI command mode panel support To: Sebastian Reichel CC: Tony Lindgren , Laurent Pinchart , , , References: <20170724173311.27170-1-sebastian.reichel@collabora.co.uk> <20170929132649.63dy7mzjgknaevoa@earth> <20171013171207.GO4394@atomide.com> <20171023220100.cso5sbxcx7itcj5r@earth> From: Tomi Valkeinen Message-ID: Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2017 14:59:10 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20171023220100.cso5sbxcx7itcj5r@earth> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 24/10/17 01:01, Sebastian Reichel wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 10:12:08AM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote: >> * Tomi Valkeinen [171012 01:46]: >>> On 29/09/17 16:26, Sebastian Reichel wrote: >>>> Hi Tomi & Laurent, >>>> >>>> ping? >>> >>> I've been having quick glances at this every now and then, but I'm not >>> sure what to do with the series. >>> >>> We have one work item that more or less overrides everything but >>> critical fixes: moving to common DRM encoder/panel drivers. Anything >>> that makes that work more difficult should be postponed. >>> >>> Especially patch 6 in this series most likely falls into that category, >>> and might require a very different implementation with common DRM >>> drivers. Also everything in panel-dsi-cm needs to be ported to a common >>> DRM panel driver when can use them. >>> >>> So my gut feeling is that it's best to keep this out for now, and rework >>> it after Laurent gets the common DRM drivers working with omapdrm. >> >> Laurent, got any other comments? >> >> Maybe some of patches can be already applied to shrink down this >> set a bit? > > I talked with Laurent at ELCE about this patchset and he is fine > with this series going in before his work assuming its fine > otherwise. He has not yet reviewed it, though and is busy the > next two weeks. > > Regarding the panel-dsi-cm porting work: I will take care of this > once the driver uses common DRM drivers. I don't expect major > problems once omapdrm implements common drm's mipi_dsi_host. I > do use the standard DT properties already. > > I do agree, that not applying this series makes Laurent's porting > work easier, since he can rip out all of DSI. It's not used by > anything except panel-dsi-cm, which is broken without this patchset. > I don't think that's a fair thing to do, though. > > P.S.: I got asked by different people about the status of this > patchset, which is required for display support on N9, N950 and > Droid 4. It's not just me and Tony, that are interested in this :) Ok. If you agree to help with the DSI part in the future, I have no problems applying these (after review and testing, of course). My worry is not only with complicating Laurent's work towards common DRM drivers, but also with the maintenance burden this brings. Keeping DSI working in the future may be challenging due to the lack of users and (easy to use) boards. I do have a N950 and OMAP4 Blaze Tablet, though, so I'm able to test both command and video modes. But getting those boot up is not always trivial, especially for the blaze tablet. I've also spent many hours this year debugging obscure OMAP3 DSS HW issues, so my opinion about adding more OMAP3 DSS features may be a bit biased =). I'll have a look at this series when I find a bit of spare time. -- Texas Instruments Finland Oy, Porkkalankatu 22, 00180 Helsinki. Y-tunnus/Business ID: 0615521-4. Kotipaikka/Domicile: Helsinki From 1582087387615293647@xxx Mon Oct 23 22:01:47 +0000 2017 X-GM-THRID: 1573826888599063531 X-Gmail-Labels: Inbox,Category Forums