Received: by 10.223.164.202 with SMTP id h10csp3703115wrb; Sat, 25 Nov 2017 15:03:53 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMZOQ8+Hvj0FvcKyAl9iCYVAX8seSzdEj5edTzDq5PcQZibXFyYPNuuXdig1AiHBUo1OhmWe X-Received: by 10.99.117.83 with SMTP id f19mr8354302pgn.255.1511651033612; Sat, 25 Nov 2017 15:03:53 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1511651033; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=EXnGdx4F6VUO2pVn50Uk18jr89O0EL9rkTtkWsgryO2/3rKzBS0QV0eyhYN1CD/zYt Mttclc748hJg4e3QRX+GANdDiz/ZxbXHw0rlJpuW38lOh8CfTI4vJ9crBQmnhHov5RQ5 1y2KWTk4BZhLIwVSS4e0kxhY2jcE1zlfSCAO3AgkssPz6Vxl7EJHNOPqu7z/sOnpY43A llSdH542pZIi1gmyEgu5sPEoiGaoVSTX2CREeG2hEYdJagHazLTWh/8BNShftw7YIRE7 fwBjVau8Tcfmdw8uUKP0AFX5vnFQ7nmLolOvKTaSH4OkMhr3Z4XBbGMGsjcPzUcuXXZU /tog== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:organization:from:references:cc:to:subject :arc-authentication-results; bh=tnC6iNlFzqKekV+FFyrmNOB5RyJTNWnZV3/cAupXp6E=; b=SCv+RBxzd7DxZSkspdvDEvCDrEDRcsjDu22SazttvX/Br3Btkyz+sojeoc/caerV4x K3//m9HjdSBh6AmeVJpign9fE8//h0FxQXbYHcPg07dXyPsMBonnNyJlRRNE6TTylHJZ /cc/Oes3/7upJ+iRbBBMWgatEARpILJlsrZ5D/+NCXNRL9faRYdyu7vQB49Sn54jMp58 OBgNQXbk0J+Vsg0zxsf7zRBXTZFPYdHF4dV4IvKI1ISTwY0roUnvpwdx5pXlHlQNnyxR KM1Od/tk8Ou4jYBlB+9xJtxiw6ePlPjUJL9APMYInijkKxKBTXUqNwAZJN23zQy1xxPr T2SQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id l63si16520256plb.82.2017.11.25.15.03.35; Sat, 25 Nov 2017 15:03:53 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751853AbdKYXC6 (ORCPT + 81 others); Sat, 25 Nov 2017 18:02:58 -0500 Received: from mail.thelounge.net ([91.118.73.15]:64003 "EHLO mail.thelounge.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751415AbdKYXC4 (ORCPT ); Sat, 25 Nov 2017 18:02:56 -0500 X-Greylist: delayed 1065 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Sat, 25 Nov 2017 18:02:55 EST Received: from srv-rhsoft.rhsoft.net (Authenticated sender: h.reindl@thelounge.net) by mail.thelounge.net (THELOUNGE MTA) with ESMTPSA id 3ykp6W6NS4zXMR; Sat, 25 Nov 2017 23:45:07 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: regression: 4.13 cannot follow symlinks on some ext3 fs To: Dave Chinner , Andreas Dilger Cc: Andi Kleen , Theodore Ts'o , Tahsin Erdogan , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-fsdevel , linux-ext4 References: <20171123203330.GN2482@two.firstfloor.org> <20171123222317.bq2v26zm5i2jspui@thunk.org> <20171123233101.GP2482@two.firstfloor.org> <700971AC-BDE2-4993-BD56-7497AD8A0FC4@dilger.ca> <20171124020435.GQ2482@two.firstfloor.org> <20171124165102.GS2482@two.firstfloor.org> <706E8F37-95C7-4321-AACA-2ED11F82E625@dilger.ca> <20171125223202.GL4094@dastard> From: Reindl Harald Organization: the lounge interactive design Message-ID: Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2017 23:45:07 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20171125223202.GL4094@dastard> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: de-CH Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Am 25.11.2017 um 23:32 schrieb Dave Chinner: > On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 03:03:37PM -0700, Andreas Dilger wrote: >> Any worse an idea than running a new kernel on an old system? >> Newer e2fsck fixes a lot of bugs that are present in older >> e2fsck as well... > > I'm running with everything up to date (debian unstable) on these > VMs, they are just an old filesystem because some distros have had > reliable rolling updates for the entire life of these VMs. :P but why not update the FS to ext4? our whole infrastructure was installed with Fedora 9 on ext3 (currently running F26, yum/dnf dist-upgrades) but any FS including the rootfs was converted to ext4 in 2010 From 1585080660395357808@xxx Sat Nov 25 22:58:35 +0000 2017 X-GM-THRID: 1584890393078112471 X-Gmail-Labels: Inbox,Category Forums,HistoricalUnread