Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Wed, 8 Nov 2017 04:02:26 +0100
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
To:     Brandon Streiff <brandon.streiff@ni.com>
Cc:     Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>,
        "netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
        Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com>,
        Erik Hons <erik.hons@ni.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next RFC 0/9] net: dsa: PTP timestamping for mv88e6xxx
Message-ID: <20171108030226.GH7601@lunn.ch>
References: <1506612341-18061-1-git-send-email-brandon.streiff@ni.com>
 <20170929094323.cwh2ubv4odknlyot@localhost>
 <20171008153821.w4pm6j43lpdvnpph@localhost>
 <20171106145546.atfjkqf3xdxu4wyg@localhost>
 <20171107181344.b4itrmd7atxkwc5x@localhost>
 <CO2PR04MB2184661473BE7E1B2C98A8449F510@CO2PR04MB2184.namprd04.prod.outlook.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CO2PR04MB2184661473BE7E1B2C98A8449F510@CO2PR04MB2184.namprd04.prod.outlook.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

> One thing that we're not doing (and probably should be) is
> configuring multicast frames to 01:1B:19:00:00:00 to be destined to
> the CPU port.

So i did a quick test. If the application joins 224.0.1.129 on the
slave interface, the switch will pass the packets to the host and to
the application.

      Andrew

From 1583466859223286432@xxx Wed Nov 08 03:27:54 +0000 2017
X-GM-THRID: 1579797979616373237
X-Gmail-Labels: Inbox,Category Forums,HistoricalUnread