Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
From:   Brandon Streiff <brandon.streiff@ni.com>
To:     Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>
CC:     "netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
        Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com>,
        Erik Hons <erik.hons@ni.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next RFC 0/9] net: dsa: PTP timestamping for mv88e6xxx
Thread-Topic: [PATCH net-next RFC 0/9] net: dsa: PTP timestamping for
 mv88e6xxx
Thread-Index: AQHTOG5hrTy8aIiWg0Kn4mJ2d4K0PKLLneuAgA6IKICALYe3AIAByaQAgAAFM0A=
Date:   Tue, 7 Nov 2017 20:56:05 +0000
Message-ID: <CO2PR04MB2184661473BE7E1B2C98A8449F510@CO2PR04MB2184.namprd04.prod.outlook.com>
References: <1506612341-18061-1-git-send-email-brandon.streiff@ni.com>
 <20170929094323.cwh2ubv4odknlyot@localhost>
 <20171008153821.w4pm6j43lpdvnpph@localhost>
 <20171106145546.atfjkqf3xdxu4wyg@localhost>
 <20171107181344.b4itrmd7atxkwc5x@localhost>
In-Reply-To: <20171107181344.b4itrmd7atxkwc5x@localhost>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: ni.com does not designate
 permitted sender hosts)
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: a856caa4-350b-45c7-1e33-08d52621f6e3
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 07 Nov 2017 20:56:05.9242
 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 87ba1f9a-44cd-43a6-b008-6fdb45a5204e
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DM5PR0401MB3608
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:,, definitions=2017-11-07_07:,,
 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_policy_notspam policy=outbound_policy score=30
 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0
 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 impostorscore=0 adultscore=0
 classifier=spam adjust=30 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1707230000
 definitions=main-1711070273
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

> Oops, I had "slaveOnly" set in my PC's configuration.  So layer2 seems
> to work as expected.
>=20
> Have you tested UDPv4?  It doesn't work.

I have not. Our usage has been focused on 802.1AS; the ptp4l settings we
use are the following:

transportSpecific    0x1
ptp_dst_mac          01:80:C2:00:00:0E
p2p_dst_mac          01:80:C2:00:00:0E
network_transport    L2
delay_mechanism      P2P
time_stamping        hardware

One thing that we're not doing (and probably should be) is configuring
multicast frames to 01:1B:19:00:00:00 to be destined to the CPU port.
(01:80:C2:00:00:0E is used for management, so the *_mgmt_rsvd2cpu()
functions give us that "for free".) That might be necessary to make 1588
L2 work properly. I don't know if that would affect 1588 L4, or if
there's anything else missing to make L4 timestamping work from the HW
perspective.

-- brandon

From 1583462466947806090@xxx Wed Nov 08 02:18:05 +0000 2017
X-GM-THRID: 1579797979616373237
X-Gmail-Labels: Inbox,Category Forums,HistoricalUnread