Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 15:15:58 -0500 (EST)
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
cc: john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
       Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
       Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
       Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
       Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
       Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
       Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca>,
       Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com>,
       Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>,
       Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Tim Bird <tim.bird@am.sony.com>,
       Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>, "Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@redhat.com>,
       Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 13/22 -v2] handle accurate time keeping over long
 delays
In-Reply-To: <12c511ca0801101154q224c7a43sa016190cf209d304@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0801101510210.15391@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
References: <20080109232914.676624725@goodmis.org>  <20080109233044.288563621@goodmis.org>
  <1199923219.6350.16.camel@localhost.localdomain>
 <12c511ca0801101154q224c7a43sa016190cf209d304@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 650
Lines: 19


> I'm trying to figure out all the ramifications of the new
> "cycle_accumulated" field.  Does it really need to be

John,

Before we hardcode these names, can we change them?  Later in the series I
use something called 'cycle_raw' which really should be called
'cycle_accumulated'. Since cycle_accumulated IIRC can go backwards.

Or do you think I should rename cycle_raw to cycle_monotonic?

-- Steve

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/