Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757560AbYAJWjV (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Jan 2008 17:39:21 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753382AbYAJWjK (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Jan 2008 17:39:10 -0500 Received: from outpipe-village-512-1.bc.nu ([81.2.110.250]:50182 "EHLO lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753242AbYAJWjI (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Jan 2008 17:39:08 -0500 Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 22:36:23 +0000 From: Alan Cox To: Brent Casavant Cc: Herbert Xu , penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp, netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: AF_UNIX MSG_PEEK bug? Message-ID: <20080110223623.3a925f57@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.2.0 (GTK+ 2.12.3; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Organization: Red Hat UK Cyf., Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SL4 1TE, Y Deyrnas Gyfunol. Cofrestrwyd yng Nghymru a Lloegr o'r rhif cofrestru 3798903 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 593 Lines: 13 > and the parallel portions/comments in unix_dgram_recvmsg(), > it looks like there's been a lot of uncertainty as to how > file descriptor passing should be handled durning MSG_PEEK > operations. To quote: The specs basically don't answer the question. What is critical is that the behaviour does not change compared with older Linux releases. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/