Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759477AbYAJXan (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Jan 2008 18:30:43 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754108AbYAJXaf (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Jan 2008 18:30:35 -0500 Received: from nz-out-0506.google.com ([64.233.162.237]:53547 "EHLO nz-out-0506.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753563AbYAJXae (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Jan 2008 18:30:34 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=sHLeNhGivdv0bHxtVmxH+yj+actSeb82qyhuZMaRXHZdTpOGjFYvjMYJvl9NYPxHcuR2nt8Aa/Vid9tFKLcXO+GY9f2lIaeS0qMP7AXRhP9dJ5Sp68ShdUWk1Ym7KNaTX6WM8OsuoNUkbok1JYNhO0Ye+W7vYlkXRpQBonyZOtI= Message-ID: <4d8e3fd30801101530j79b35640rea45ea37b41a81c5@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 00:30:30 +0100 From: "Paolo Ciarrocchi" To: "Daniel Walker" Subject: Re: [x86] list of style offenders Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <1200006481.29897.48.camel@imap.mvista.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <1199995391.29897.26.camel@imap.mvista.com> <4d8e3fd30801101435l228a0d0ydd0174e4073400e6@mail.gmail.com> <1200006481.29897.48.camel@imap.mvista.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 3599 Lines: 87 On Jan 11, 2008 12:08 AM, Daniel Walker wrote: > > On Thu, 2008-01-10 at 23:35 +0100, Paolo Ciarrocchi wrote: > > On Jan 10, 2008 9:03 PM, Daniel Walker wrote: > > > > > > > > > I was playing with checkpatch.pl ;) .. I made a list of style offenders > > > inside the arch/x86/ sub-directory. I thought it might be helpful to > > > prioritize any style clean ups that people might want to do for x86 .. > > > OTOH some of these might show imperfections in checkpatch.pl .. Either > > > way I thought it was interesting to review .. > > > > > > These are sorted by errors, then warnings.. I only included the first > > > hundred files which includes about the top %30 of the list .. The > > > kprobes_64.c error rate is a little miss-leading because several errors > > > are found on a single line .. > > > > I just pulled > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/x86/linux-2.6-x86 mm > > > > > ./arch/x86/math-emu/fpu_trig.c > > > total: 649 errors, 11 warnings, 1845 lines checked > > > > On that tree checkpatch reports: > > total: 5 errors, 54 warnings, 1643 lines checked > > > > > ./arch/x86/kernel/kprobes_64.c > > > total: 528 errors, 9 warnings, 749 lines checked > > > > total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 1 lines checked > > I pulled the tree your working with , and it's got mostly the same > issues .. Are you sure your running the commands properly? > > The "lines checked" values that you listed looks wrong .. A few you > listed as "0 lines checked" , or "1 lines checked" .. Which can't be > right.. > > The git logs also show that arch/x86/math-emu/fpu_trig.c hasn't been > modified since it was pull in on Oct. 11 .. Top commit in my tree is: commit 62ba5681e2e2d70794719794eadb441875e6d3b3 Author: From: Jan Beulich Date: Wed Jan 9 13:31:14 2008 +0100 paolo@paolo-desktop:~/linux-2.6$ ./scripts/checkpatch.pl --file ./arch/x86/kernel/kprobes_64.c total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 1 lines checked And...paolo@paolo-desktop:~/linux-2.6$ ls -l ./arch/x86/kernel/k* -rw-r--r-- 1 paolo paolo 2853 2007-11-08 23:00 ./arch/x86/kernel/k8.c -rw-r--r-- 1 paolo paolo 1207 2008-01-10 23:27 ./arch/x86/kernel/kdebugfs.c -rw-r--r-- 1 paolo paolo 9828 2008-01-10 23:27 ./arch/x86/kernel/kgdb_32.c -rw-r--r-- 1 paolo paolo 11936 2008-01-10 23:27 ./arch/x86/kernel/kgdb_64.c -rw-r--r-- 1 paolo paolo 2223 2008-01-10 23:27 ./arch/x86/kernel/kgdb-jmp_32.S -rw-r--r-- 1 paolo paolo 1783 2008-01-10 23:27 ./arch/x86/kernel/kgdb-jmp_64.S -rw-r--r-- 1 paolo paolo 1 2008-01-10 23:27 ./arch/x86/kernel/kprobes_64.c <-- What? -rw-r--r-- 1 paolo paolo 32078 2008-01-10 23:27 ./arch/x86/kernel/kprobes.c I've pulled the tree as follow: git branch x86 git checkout x86 git-pull --force git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/x86/linux-2.6-x86.git mm I tried to pull again and I've got: paolo@paolo-desktop:~/linux-2.6$ git-pull --force git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/x86/linux-2.6-x86.git mm Already up-to-date. gitweb seems to confirm what I'm seeing: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/x86/linux-2.6-x86.git;a=shortlog;h=mm http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/x86/linux-2.6-x86.git;a=blob_plain;f=arch/x86/kernel/kprobes_64.c;hb=mm which is an empty file Ciao, -- Paolo http://paolo.ciarrocchi.googlepages.com/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/