Received: by 10.223.164.202 with SMTP id h10csp4381438wrb; Wed, 29 Nov 2017 05:36:23 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMYeMsachQlYDtxi6G7PTZYHi8CIKEn90++Id3zpJRAdXo08dG/K50kdtlh6hVm0QiKryQAn X-Received: by 10.99.177.75 with SMTP id g11mr2865230pgp.268.1511962583788; Wed, 29 Nov 2017 05:36:23 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1511962583; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=c/hbsGgNp2NUEVfXZeTA/f0ezjZXl5PDCdya9K52KIiXf2u8SGrDPW8TP6hGgeuEyZ 85fE8HnVuAl4bmG5yX3QNSItHV442AGFHJUscmwQBONIO55/4zzrCAqatcENx083AmFO eSkS7FKvGNyWsoOOKX8JJJuleWQmV+7oBCUH/jnhhSUuvDpyeLeh9zIygo98a2NXVy9e xUMw7P8/keBKJNBxXlhE2B+Fxdu0DNU1+0Xwn7VQ2ea+DhqKvjljzBF3INKWdxTvHt7+ m5FkBAqLMkPLutGtCJjLjeWND8QC5M07ynmbBsNcT/awocO4nZB/K37jrWfjQiLJutNi HY1g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from :arc-authentication-results; bh=CAsYcWXKel72k7KWBnEign1Bmltf+G6pYi7XHoo7KWs=; b=RsKt7aMF26XFcwilicZuHlKA41eIIP4atDIpUR8v5/Z48QF/+9sQZPwYGkwQWj4hwU GAzc+o3y/yYhHLPU2RiAr/XMrbngjdmGw9T4VzO3QCJcbH6XrfgNi7sCkhJamdqrdm/J q9g4PiTm8iPlRfGXMzzIcUssgLc7o+LvLNE9SpKbHwPL3mU0u16/dTiec3u6TcLBzjPK Y6pL9KaZz4kNMNJi0ezt40CJMGrYTY5hLdtzhHt8UkLH4gKd1/BOnXPWYGh0FXFqCRfo Snrczx0ltaJ1x6D+ChAvspZittY80vPnd8JqUbMitv5DqYVLeNMD4LDBxGDItnPB3aGq 62dA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id y38si1309639plh.61.2017.11.29.05.36.12; Wed, 29 Nov 2017 05:36:23 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752905AbdK2LVj (ORCPT + 70 others); Wed, 29 Nov 2017 06:21:39 -0500 Received: from mga11.intel.com ([192.55.52.93]:35187 "EHLO mga11.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751496AbdK2LVh (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Nov 2017 06:21:37 -0500 Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by fmsmga102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 29 Nov 2017 03:21:37 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.44,472,1505804400"; d="scan'208";a="1249852119" Received: from elena-thinkpad-x230.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.87]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 29 Nov 2017 03:21:35 -0800 From: Elena Reshetova To: viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, peterz@infradead.org, keescook@chromium.org, Elena Reshetova Subject: [PATCH] posix_acl: convert posix_acl.a_refcount from atomic_t to refcount_t Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2017 13:19:31 +0200 Message-Id: <1511954371-15420-1-git-send-email-elena.reshetova@intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.7.4 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org atomic_t variables are currently used to implement reference counters with the following properties: - counter is initialized to 1 using atomic_set() - a resource is freed upon counter reaching zero - once counter reaches zero, its further increments aren't allowed - counter schema uses basic atomic operations (set, inc, inc_not_zero, dec_and_test, etc.) Such atomic variables should be converted to a newly provided refcount_t type and API that prevents accidental counter overflows and underflows. This is important since overflows and underflows can lead to use-after-free situation and be exploitable. The variable posix_acl.a_refcount is used as pure reference counter. Convert it to refcount_t and fix up the operations. **Important note for maintainers: Some functions from refcount_t API defined in lib/refcount.c have different memory ordering guarantees than their atomic counterparts. The full comparison can be seen in https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/11/15/57 and it is hopefully soon in state to be merged to the documentation tree. Normally the differences should not matter since refcount_t provides enough guarantees to satisfy the refcounting use cases, but in some rare cases it might matter. Please double check that you don't have some undocumented memory guarantees for this variable usage. For the posix_acl.a_refcount it might make a difference in following places: - get_cached_acl(): increment in refcount_inc_not_zero() only guarantees control dependency on success vs. fully ordered atomic counterpart. However this operation is performed under rcu_read_lock(), so this should be fine. - posix_acl_release(): decrement in refcount_dec_and_test() only provides RELEASE ordering and control dependency on success vs. fully ordered atomic counterpart Suggested-by: Kees Cook Reviewed-by: David Windsor Reviewed-by: Hans Liljestrand Signed-off-by: Elena Reshetova --- fs/f2fs/acl.c | 2 +- fs/posix_acl.c | 6 +++--- include/linux/posix_acl.h | 7 ++++--- 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/f2fs/acl.c b/fs/f2fs/acl.c index 2bb7c9f..1118241 100644 --- a/fs/f2fs/acl.c +++ b/fs/f2fs/acl.c @@ -270,7 +270,7 @@ static struct posix_acl *f2fs_acl_clone(const struct posix_acl *acl, sizeof(struct posix_acl_entry); clone = kmemdup(acl, size, flags); if (clone) - atomic_set(&clone->a_refcount, 1); + refcount_set(&clone->a_refcount, 1); } return clone; } diff --git a/fs/posix_acl.c b/fs/posix_acl.c index eebf5f6..2fd0fde 100644 --- a/fs/posix_acl.c +++ b/fs/posix_acl.c @@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ struct posix_acl *get_cached_acl(struct inode *inode, int type) rcu_read_lock(); acl = rcu_dereference(*p); if (!acl || is_uncached_acl(acl) || - atomic_inc_not_zero(&acl->a_refcount)) + refcount_inc_not_zero(&acl->a_refcount)) break; rcu_read_unlock(); cpu_relax(); @@ -164,7 +164,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(get_acl); void posix_acl_init(struct posix_acl *acl, int count) { - atomic_set(&acl->a_refcount, 1); + refcount_set(&acl->a_refcount, 1); acl->a_count = count; } EXPORT_SYMBOL(posix_acl_init); @@ -197,7 +197,7 @@ posix_acl_clone(const struct posix_acl *acl, gfp_t flags) sizeof(struct posix_acl_entry); clone = kmemdup(acl, size, flags); if (clone) - atomic_set(&clone->a_refcount, 1); + refcount_set(&clone->a_refcount, 1); } return clone; } diff --git a/include/linux/posix_acl.h b/include/linux/posix_acl.h index b2b7255..540595a 100644 --- a/include/linux/posix_acl.h +++ b/include/linux/posix_acl.h @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ #include #include #include +#include #include struct posix_acl_entry { @@ -24,7 +25,7 @@ struct posix_acl_entry { }; struct posix_acl { - atomic_t a_refcount; + refcount_t a_refcount; struct rcu_head a_rcu; unsigned int a_count; struct posix_acl_entry a_entries[0]; @@ -41,7 +42,7 @@ static inline struct posix_acl * posix_acl_dup(struct posix_acl *acl) { if (acl) - atomic_inc(&acl->a_refcount); + refcount_inc(&acl->a_refcount); return acl; } @@ -51,7 +52,7 @@ posix_acl_dup(struct posix_acl *acl) static inline void posix_acl_release(struct posix_acl *acl) { - if (acl && atomic_dec_and_test(&acl->a_refcount)) + if (acl && refcount_dec_and_test(&acl->a_refcount)) kfree_rcu(acl, a_rcu); } -- 2.7.4 From 1585433336344527056@xxx Wed Nov 29 20:24:13 +0000 2017 X-GM-THRID: 1585433336344527056 X-Gmail-Labels: Inbox,Category Forums,HistoricalUnread