Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 21 Nov 2000 21:46:54 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 21 Nov 2000 21:46:44 -0500 Received: from wire.cadcamlab.org ([156.26.20.181]:35594 "EHLO wire.cadcamlab.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 21 Nov 2000 21:46:38 -0500 Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2000 20:16:31 -0600 To: Alan Cox Cc: jpranevich@lycos-inc.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: linux-2.2.18-pre19 asm/delay.h problem? Message-ID: <20001121201631.I2918@wire.cadcamlab.org> In-Reply-To: <0525699E.00832462.00@SMTPNotes1.ma.lycos.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk on Tue, Nov 21, 2000 at 11:57:02PM +0000 From: Peter Samuelson Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org [Alan Cox] > You got it. The module is doing an overlarge delay Perhaps people would stop asking this question if the symbol were renamed from __bad_udelay() to, say, __use_mdelay_instead_please(). Sort of like the DNS zone (somewhere at UCLA was it?) where they had something like 'quit 86400 IN CNAME use.exit.to.get.out.of.nslookup.' Peter - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/