Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Subject: Re: [Question] does there have another fix for ldisc crash instead of
 "tty: Fix ldisc crash on reopened tty" ?
To:     Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
References: <5A1E687F.400@huawei.com> <20171129080248.GA1918@kroah.com>
CC:     <peter@hurleysoftware.com>, <dvyukov@google.com>,
        <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>, <mpatocka@redhat.com>, <mikey@neuling.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >> LKML" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
From:   Tan Xiaojun <tanxiaojun@huawei.com>
Message-ID: <5A1E7018.7050703@huawei.com>
Date:   Wed, 29 Nov 2017 16:30:16 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/38.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20171129080248.GA1918@kroah.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On 2017/11/29 16:02, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 03:57:51PM +0800, Tan Xiaojun wrote:
>> Hi, all,
>>
>> 	I test in a Arm64 fpga board (Hisilicon D06 fpga) with kernel-stable-4.14.2, then I get a panic log attached in the end.
>>
>> 	I found this problem try to be fixed before by the patch "tty: Fix ldisc crash on reopened tty", and it was reverted
>> 	shortly thereafter because of conflicting with another patch and may not fix completely.
>>
>> 	But this problem is still here. Are there any better fixed patch now ?
> 
> Nope, care to work on one?
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h
> 

Thank you for your reply so soon.
I am not familiar with this codes, so ... I can try ...

Thanks.
Xiaojun.

> .
> 


From 1585386992637733869@xxx Wed Nov 29 08:07:36 +0000 2017
X-GM-THRID: 1585386501918363600
X-Gmail-Labels: Inbox,Category Forums,HistoricalUnread