Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Thu, 9 Nov 2017 18:35:12 +0100
From:   Radim Krcmar <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc:     Pankaj Gupta <pagupta@redhat.com>,
        Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com>,
        Eduardo Valentin <eduval@amazon.com>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
        Matt Wilson <msw@amazon.com>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
        the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,
        Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>, kvm <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        "Jan H . Schoenherr" <jschoenh@amazon.de>,
        Anthony Liguori <aliguori@amazon.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 1/1] locking/qspinlock/x86: Avoid test-and-set when
 PV_DEDICATED is set
Message-ID: <20171109173512.GH20859@flask>
References: <1509999980-10828-1-git-send-email-eduval@amazon.com>
 <CANRm+CxfYduv3qW7JNw9Li2V0DYbk5mZ0YL30Akh=eXHgaXigw@mail.gmail.com>
 <789734192.29237413.1510242805535.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com>
 <20171109160536.GE20859@flask>
 <20171109161701.y3eqqrvs5jpg46lr@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <20171109164523.GF20859@flask>
 <20171109171241.43zpahj24mhzzp3y@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <20171109171511.gckh2lt7xksmiern@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <20171109172854.ajiayvfu7jdai37v@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20171109172854.ajiayvfu7jdai37v@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

2017-11-09 18:28+0100, Peter Zijlstra:
> On Thu, Nov 09, 2017 at 06:15:11PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 09, 2017 at 06:12:41PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > On Thu, Nov 09, 2017 at 05:45:23PM +0100, Radim Krcmar wrote:
> > > > 2017-11-09 17:17+0100, Peter Zijlstra:
> > > > > On Thu, Nov 09, 2017 at 05:05:36PM +0100, Radim Krcmar wrote:
> > > > > > 2017-11-09 10:53-0500, Pankaj Gupta:
> > > > > > > 2] PV TLB should also behave as per option PV_DEDICATED for better performance.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Right,
> > > > > 
> > > > > Shouldn't KVM do flush_tlb_other() in any case? Not sure how
> > > > > PV_DEDICATED can help with that.
> > > > 
> > > > It will, the suggestion was based on recent extension of the
> > > > flush_tlb_others implementaion, https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/11/8/1146.
> > > > 
> > > > PV_TLB_FLUSH allows a guest to set a flush bit instead of sending flush
> > > > IPI if the target VCPU is not running.  This would be a waste of time
> > > > with PV_DEDICATED as all VCPUs are expected to always running.
> > > > 
> > > > With PV_DEDICATED, the guest should keep using native_flush_tlb_others.
> > > 
> > > Is saving that for_each_cpu() really worth the effort compared to the
> > > cost of actually doing the IPIs and CR3 write?
> > > 
> > > Also, you should not put cpumask_t on stack, that's 'broken'.
> > 
> > Also, you'll want to use __cpumask_clear_cpu() there.
> 
> Also^2, that patch split is crazy, after patch 2/3 your machine is
> broken due to lost TLB flushes. You have to first add the SHOULD_FLUSH
> handling and then clear CPUs from the native_flush_tlb_other() mask.

That should be fixed in v2 -- [2/3] must not enable this feature if the
host has not exposed it and [3/3] has to expose it.  (The ordering of
those two doesn't matter as they are separate kernel.)

From 1583610511705482996@xxx Thu Nov 09 17:31:12 +0000 2017
X-GM-THRID: 1583352031107436177
X-Gmail-Labels: Inbox,Category Forums,HistoricalUnread