Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Thu, 9 Nov 2017 11:37:07 -0500 (EST)
From:   Pankaj Gupta <pagupta@redhat.com>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc:     Radim Krcmar <rkrcmar@redhat.com>,
        Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com>,
        Eduardo Valentin <eduval@amazon.com>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
        Matt Wilson <msw@amazon.com>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
        the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,
        Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>, kvm <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        "Jan H . Schoenherr" <jschoenh@amazon.de>,
        Anthony Liguori <aliguori@amazon.com>
Message-ID: <1224132656.29253804.1510245427483.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <20171109161701.y3eqqrvs5jpg46lr@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
References: <1509999980-10828-1-git-send-email-eduval@amazon.com> <CANRm+CxfYduv3qW7JNw9Li2V0DYbk5mZ0YL30Akh=eXHgaXigw@mail.gmail.com> <789734192.29237413.1510242805535.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> <20171109160536.GE20859@flask> <20171109161701.y3eqqrvs5jpg46lr@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 1/1] locking/qspinlock/x86: Avoid test-and-set when
 PV_DEDICATED is set
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Thread-Topic: locking/qspinlock/x86: Avoid test-and-set when PV_DEDICATED is set
Thread-Index: CL6+cpTeD4suFwHfMoBsyz7BzGKiOg==
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk


> Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 1/1] locking/qspinlock/x86: Avoid test-and-set when PV_DEDICATED is set
> 
> On Thu, Nov 09, 2017 at 05:05:36PM +0100, Radim Krcmar wrote:
> > 2017-11-09 10:53-0500, Pankaj Gupta:
> > > 2] PV TLB should also behave as per option PV_DEDICATED for better
> > > performance.
> > 
> > Right,
> 
> Shouldn't KVM do flush_tlb_other() in any case? Not sure how
> PV_DEDICATED can help with that.

Yes.

If I understand it correctly, It will just avoid traversing all the 
cpus another time just to check/set 'KVM_VCPU_PREEMPTED'/FLUSH value and 
clear the cpu mask.

Thanks,
Pankaj

From 1583606018972669002@xxx Thu Nov 09 16:19:47 +0000 2017
X-GM-THRID: 1583352031107436177
X-Gmail-Labels: Inbox,Category Forums,HistoricalUnread