Received: by 10.223.164.202 with SMTP id h10csp175708wrb; Thu, 9 Nov 2017 04:44:06 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABhQp+SZ5+XFGHl9axu+jOP2vjTjLWjeA3pJ8wCtvaOt179RE+BtDLYxUglCaWJKtNeuZ8Eah3n4 X-Received: by 10.159.211.67 with SMTP id g3mr337601plp.381.1510231446649; Thu, 09 Nov 2017 04:44:06 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1510231446; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=JU3gbJUrqm0qM4JpNk3mGZPEqk/X2xlexYnZu5GOoAhOBbikBGGW3Do0oIyMpGtVPj zNoQhh63g8TZXiJDBnKn9fDj0NmrxF4/GmFUzwG1qY846seBagC/O9avysJ6Z+LBgS2b QkOfDChWQCmOtf7Y1FQk/I/TbJos16V0BvFrdYC8m7euj2BldIwfwa3oJeYKr5afP6RG H+RAoL33DBdOg4rd2bZWkZBZeOC0dWGNXtSh35VAzrcbRsElXzrhLEGS7rmSUvYBvkui YvmWi+RL2DNizqht+rab9OqcEpdhhuLW9C+mD9gKDaMJlN+N6pwHfM+gYl1FBUZCwz4t 4K0Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject :message-id:date:from:references:in-reply-to:mime-version :dkim-signature:arc-authentication-results; bh=T10a72Z5u1RmGc0oe6bFCqMvELgJ4JmHVBqwBdem+NY=; b=zXyCadai15SKWpTZ4di+1l8Zm1zKx2D3MebZIXanLHP9RHTd5QsOGyxfVQbmVlA02R XXY2fi8AHBxT2y4LT0+EHq7f36hOGv084Fw0DDauZM0YVS3QJAYGT3fA2bWzNNxPwikW LcsGXfV77IeKEV8dQ1gBQAlrOj3njzwMBWaqe9FXcOaXe6AFmQOAnCdsk8f0+03IQtLU U8Sd3qoLhSvY8FGq50IzonRQQJ2K17lXw2tGEcdgTvZ5HDKz68DzM3YqDF4XEzkv5ALw trpoS9sg4oiWA+BsZBNR/HrNGwienb3sreSVZc3VGmz3ZxE6STgIgjtk9JLnsWaA+qfA S2Dg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=pCieRZ77; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id r8si6370252pgq.305.2017.11.09.04.43.55; Thu, 09 Nov 2017 04:44:06 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=pCieRZ77; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754569AbdKIMnG (ORCPT + 80 others); Thu, 9 Nov 2017 07:43:06 -0500 Received: from mail-oi0-f66.google.com ([209.85.218.66]:56299 "EHLO mail-oi0-f66.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754405AbdKIMnD (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Nov 2017 07:43:03 -0500 Received: by mail-oi0-f66.google.com with SMTP id g125so4283968oib.12; Thu, 09 Nov 2017 04:43:03 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=T10a72Z5u1RmGc0oe6bFCqMvELgJ4JmHVBqwBdem+NY=; b=pCieRZ77q5qhJMCjnqv1Zr9YBqPSvLJnDo3jcuL7ZaEKHQCQLcoY+2RTILhMSteVpd 902Wj2EppT84ncinElLX01igFyfJLHvPAgmmnmxGbqh73bjVc/xrlTQO0ikBw6narFta vkpqBXwwTuVKOhxzLmYOPWl1Ca6p3swcAZOVDNG7n8fOcZZLfc6ocIJ7Nzgi6XXZe7ZJ DhoUoDqgWTJweM83J06fdbZ4UC1XfsA6PbxK0OdjxdVSAZ7xYlaCZ7wG+qfVQjwHs4eb XdC/t2EiSGgLIpMXBtFy0WZtwViQu44OrKSpO9LfckYvDoVlSls2zbfs/+Ek9nK3pzh8 SuLA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=T10a72Z5u1RmGc0oe6bFCqMvELgJ4JmHVBqwBdem+NY=; b=fiKX+PTmiyFlZhfFkKelWGrf+gtzd9ABLIedrTX0DpIZb5Kdr626Lu1tigparZ4wdD 0ySsFmrHuNvWzfxgly5rDlsTAcmvTHePoClGCYjoeYFN7eZCIMakZaSujCkTME0ki3kr Ed4HzFfKgr2zR2gb/dehz8eR5RGcA9jvZLGgEQNgSxI99J+qjl2Jdk1D2KOpyr5RaGGa xxt/76z9Xbct2+p1ih5ygD2n32tNqo2/JZ5Gx890XkMohv/JsaipyROh0Ogh1/EARYZu n0O3ziCZ/Ig6eZSyjWbLp0mEl1pIg6PUwimttf23kWMBCZYeyfUNZ7aseRq4R8Tqho0k 5CYQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AJaThX6nTdUgzCE+ej3eYGroDFiMccuDjbFRe48okQ+v25dJgnqaC9X2 mqhUWZ8epnCPUOk7XtOpezfTAa2lt3BYYu78BGI= X-Received: by 10.202.220.3 with SMTP id t3mr215447oig.237.1510231382934; Thu, 09 Nov 2017 04:43:02 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.74.53.27 with HTTP; Thu, 9 Nov 2017 04:43:02 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1509999980-10828-1-git-send-email-eduval@amazon.com> References: <1509999980-10828-1-git-send-email-eduval@amazon.com> From: Wanpeng Li Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2017 20:43:02 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 1/1] locking/qspinlock/x86: Avoid test-and-set when PV_DEDICATED is set To: Eduardo Valentin Cc: Paolo Bonzini , Radim Krcmar , Matt Wilson , Jonathan Corbet , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , "the arch/x86 maintainers" , Peter Zijlstra , Waiman Long , kvm , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "Jan H . Schoenherr" , Anthony Liguori Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 2017-11-07 4:26 GMT+08:00 Eduardo Valentin : > Currently, the existing qspinlock implementation will fallback to > test-and-set if the hypervisor has not set the PV_UNHALT flag. > > This patch gives the opportunity to guest kernels to select > between test-and-set and the regular queueu fair lock implementation > based on the PV_DEDICATED KVM feature flag. When the PV_DEDICATED > flag is not set, the code will still fall back to test-and-set, > but when the PV_DEDICATED flag is set, the code will use > the regular queue spinlock implementation. > > With this patch, when in autoselect mode, the guest will > use the default spinlock implementation based on host feature > flags as follows: > > PV_DEDICATED =3D 1, PV_UNHALT =3D anything: default is qspinlock > PV_DEDICATED =3D 0, PV_UNHALT =3D 1: default is pvqspinlock > PV_DEDICATED =3D 0, PV_UNHALT =3D 0: default is tas > > Cc: Paolo Bonzini > Cc: "Radim Kr=C4=8Dm=C3=A1=C5=99" > Cc: Jonathan Corbet > Cc: Thomas Gleixner > Cc: Ingo Molnar > Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" > Cc: x86@kernel.org > Cc: Peter Zijlstra > Cc: Waiman Long > Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org > Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org > Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Cc: Jan H. Schoenherr > Cc: Anthony Liguori > Suggested-by: Matt Wilson > Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin > --- > V3: > - When PV_DEDICATED is set (1), qspinlock is selected, > regardless of the value of PV_UNHAULT. Suggested by Paolo Bonzini. > - Refreshed on top of tip/master. > V2: > - rebase on top of tip/master > > Documentation/virtual/kvm/cpuid.txt | 6 ++++++ > arch/x86/include/asm/qspinlock.h | 4 ++++ > arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvm_para.h | 1 + > arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c | 2 ++ > 4 files changed, 13 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/Documentation/virtual/kvm/cpuid.txt b/Documentation/virtual/= kvm/cpuid.txt > index 3c65feb..117066a 100644 > --- a/Documentation/virtual/kvm/cpuid.txt > +++ b/Documentation/virtual/kvm/cpuid.txt > @@ -54,6 +54,12 @@ KVM_FEATURE_PV_UNHALT || 7 || guest c= hecks this feature bit > || || before enabling paravirtu= alized > || || spinlock support. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------= ------ > +KVM_FEATURE_PV_DEDICATED || 8 || guest checks this feature= bit > + || || to determine if they run = on > + || || dedicated vCPUs, allowing= opti- > + || || mizations such as usage o= f > + || || qspinlocks. > +------------------------------------------------------------------------= ------ > KVM_FEATURE_CLOCKSOURCE_STABLE_BIT || 24 || host will warn if no gues= t-side > || || per-cpu warps are expecte= d in > || || kvmclock. > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/qspinlock.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/qspi= nlock.h > index 5e16b5d..de42694 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/qspinlock.h > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/qspinlock.h > @@ -3,6 +3,8 @@ > #define _ASM_X86_QSPINLOCK_H > > #include > +#include > + > #include > #include > #include > @@ -58,6 +60,8 @@ static inline bool virt_spin_lock(struct qspinlock *loc= k) > if (!static_branch_likely(&virt_spin_lock_key)) > return false; > > + if (kvm_para_has_feature(KVM_FEATURE_PV_DEDICATED)) > + return false; > /* > * On hypervisors without PARAVIRT_SPINLOCKS support we fall > * back to a Test-and-Set spinlock, because fair locks have > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvm_para.h b/arch/x86/include/uapi= /asm/kvm_para.h > index 554aa8f..85a9875 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvm_para.h > +++ b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvm_para.h > @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ > #define KVM_FEATURE_STEAL_TIME 5 > #define KVM_FEATURE_PV_EOI 6 > #define KVM_FEATURE_PV_UNHALT 7 > +#define KVM_FEATURE_PV_DEDICATED 8 > > /* The last 8 bits are used to indicate how to interpret the flags field > * in pvclock structure. If no bits are set, all flags are ignored. > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c b/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c > index 8bb9594..dacd7cf 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c > @@ -642,6 +642,8 @@ void __init kvm_spinlock_init(void) > { > if (!kvm_para_available()) > return; > + if (kvm_para_has_feature(KVM_FEATURE_PV_DEDICATED)) > + return; > /* Does host kernel support KVM_FEATURE_PV_UNHALT? */ > if (!kvm_para_has_feature(KVM_FEATURE_PV_UNHALT)) > return; > -- > 2.7.4 > You should also add a cpuid flag in kvm part. Regards, Wanpeng Li From 1583578152907086095@xxx Thu Nov 09 08:56:52 +0000 2017 X-GM-THRID: 1583352031107436177 X-Gmail-Labels: Inbox,Category Forums,HistoricalUnread