Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 2 Jan 2002 19:09:57 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 2 Jan 2002 19:08:18 -0500 Received: from pizda.ninka.net ([216.101.162.242]:7296 "EHLO pizda.ninka.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 2 Jan 2002 19:07:50 -0500 Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2002 16:06:41 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <20020102.160641.92584044.davem@redhat.com> To: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk Cc: garzik@havoc.gtf.org, manfred@colorfullife.com, klink@clouddancer.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: From: "David S. Miller" In-Reply-To: In-Reply-To: <20011225141441.A14941@havoc.gtf.org> X-Mailer: Mew version 2.1 on Emacs 21.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Alan Cox Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2001 22:03:59 +0000 (GMT) > required DaveM made it unconditional... I think the checkin comment was > something along the lines of "make it unconditional unless Alan > complains about kernel bloat" :) And I did complain. "Red Hat needs XYZ so we make it mandatory" is not an appropriate approach to a problem. [ Just got back from British Columbia... ] No you did not complain. I asked you specifically if it was ok, and your response was that turning netlink/rtnetlink on by default was fine with you. It has zilch to do with redhat anything, in fact I had to ask vendors first if they could still fit the kernel on their boot disks if I added ~5K of object code to kernels with networking enabled. It has everything to do with iproute2 and tcp_diag using it. Franks a lot, David S. Miller davem@redhat.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/