Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1763461AbYAKXSv (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Jan 2008 18:18:51 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1762159AbYAKXSn (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Jan 2008 18:18:43 -0500 Received: from smtp-outbound-1.vmware.com ([65.113.40.141]:60424 "EHLO smtp-outbound-1.vmware.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1762098AbYAKXSm (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Jan 2008 18:18:42 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH] serverworks: IRQ routing needs no _p From: Zachary Amsden To: Alan Cox Cc: akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com In-Reply-To: <20080111181434.3dec6206@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> References: <20080111181434.3dec6206@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 15:22:41 -0800 Message-Id: <1200093761.21817.32.camel@bodhitayantram.eng.vmware.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.10.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 640 Lines: 16 On Fri, 2008-01-11 at 18:14 +0000, Alan Cox wrote: > I can find no reason for the _p on the serverworks IRQ routing logic, and > a review of the documentation contains no indication that any such delay > is needed so lets try this > Looks good to me; unfortunately my Serverworks boxes got upgraded so I can't test, but install base is really big. Acked-by: Zachary Amsden -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/