Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/1] perf/bench/numa: Fixup discontiguous/sparse
 numa nodes
From:   Satheesh Rajendran <sathnaga@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:     "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, acme@kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
        mingo@kernel.org
Cc:     bala24@linux.vnet.ibm.com, srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com
In-Reply-To: <1511366847.k4y13an79p.naveen@linux.ibm.com>
References: <1511336642-15389-1-git-send-email-sathnaga@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
         <1511366847.k4y13an79p.naveen@linux.ibm.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Date:   Wed, 22 Nov 2017 22:18:13 +0530
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-Id: <1511369293.11553.2.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, 2017-11-22 at 21:39 +0530, Naveen N. Rao wrote:
> >               sum += nr;
> >       }
> >       BUG_ON(nr_min > nr_max);
> > -
> >       BUG_ON(sum > g->p.nr_tasks);
> 
> Looks like that change to remove a blank line did slip in, but that's
> a 
> small nit. Apart from that, the patch looks good to me.
> Acked-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> 
Hi Naveen,

Thanks, have sent v5 with that addressed :-)

Regards,
-Satheesh
> - Naveen


From 1584783211618824362@xxx Wed Nov 22 16:10:45 +0000 2017
X-GM-THRID: 1584751438281185795
X-Gmail-Labels: Inbox,Category Forums,HistoricalUnread