Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1763392AbYALNnT (ORCPT ); Sat, 12 Jan 2008 08:43:19 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756920AbYALNnF (ORCPT ); Sat, 12 Jan 2008 08:43:05 -0500 Received: from smtpq2.tilbu1.nb.home.nl ([213.51.146.201]:52779 "EHLO smtpq2.tilbu1.nb.home.nl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753351AbYALNnE (ORCPT ); Sat, 12 Jan 2008 08:43:04 -0500 Message-ID: <4788C323.6090206@keyaccess.nl> Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 14:39:47 +0100 From: Rene Herman User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Pierre Ossman CC: Pavel Machek , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Ondrej Zary , Jaroslav Kysela , ALSA development , Linux Kernel , Bjorn Helgaas , Andrew Morton , Takashi Iwai , linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] PNP_DRIVER_RES_DISABLE breaks swsusp at least with snd_cs4236 References: <200801092343.48726.linux@rainbow-software.org> <20080111080141.75aaad5f@poseidon.drzeus.cx> <47877B83.5040604@keyaccess.nl> <200801111940.22023.linux@rainbow-software.org> <4788168F.8070403@keyaccess.nl> <20080112121256.0f2e96ad@poseidon.drzeus.cx> In-Reply-To: <20080112121256.0f2e96ad@poseidon.drzeus.cx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1817 Lines: 38 On 12-01-08 12:12, Pierre Ossman wrote: > On Sat, 12 Jan 2008 02:23:27 +0100 > Rene Herman wrote: > >> Pavel, Rafael -- the attached fixes snd-cs4236 not coming back to life for >> Ondrej after hibernation due to the PNP_DRIVER_RES_DO_NOT_CHANGE test >> triggering in pnp_bus_resume() and keeping the card in a suspended state. >> > > I'm a bit confused here. Bjorn Helgaas wanted to remove the pnp_start/stop_dev() calls completely, and you want them called all the time. :) Wanted where? Haven't seen a coment from Bjorn? But -- while removing them both looks (as) sensible from a mirror-image viewpoint, this wouldn't fix the problem. As fas as I understand things, "hibernation" is basically "save state, shut down machine" where the latter step is going to disable the card inevitably. On resume, you're going to need to restore the resources (that were saved in pnp_dev->res) that it was using to the card, which is what pnp_start_dev() does -- it not being called is the current problem of the card not coming back to life. pnp_stop_dev() could go in this specific situation. Not much point in first disabling the thing it seems if a subsequent shutdown is going to take care of that anyway. However, suspend/resume isn't just called in the case of complete hibernation I guess and I know nothing about it all -- hence my request to the hiberhation people for how this is designed to be. But we certainly need the pnp_start_dev() in the current flow of things. It not being called is the problem this fixes... Rene. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/