Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756402AbYALPrR (ORCPT ); Sat, 12 Jan 2008 10:47:17 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752928AbYALPrA (ORCPT ); Sat, 12 Jan 2008 10:47:00 -0500 Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:40595 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750846AbYALPq7 (ORCPT ); Sat, 12 Jan 2008 10:46:59 -0500 Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 07:46:32 -0800 From: Arjan van de Ven To: Ivan Kokshaysky Cc: Greg KH , Matthew Wilcox , Linus Torvalds , Greg KH , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jeff Garzik , linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz, Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Martin Mares , Tony Camuso , Loic Prylli Subject: Re: [Patch v2] Make PCI extended config space (MMCONFIG) a driver opt-in Message-ID: <20080112074632.3ca72d27@laptopd505.fenrus.org> In-Reply-To: <20080112144030.GA19279@jurassic.park.msu.ru> References: <20080111201716.GO18741@parisc-linux.org> <20080111204228.GP18741@parisc-linux.org> <20080111211753.GR18741@parisc-linux.org> <20080111213803.GS18741@parisc-linux.org> <20080111235856.GA16079@jurassic.park.msu.ru> <20080112002638.GA18710@kroah.com> <20080112144030.GA19279@jurassic.park.msu.ru> Organization: Intel X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.0.2 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by pentafluge.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 899 Lines: 22 On Sat, 12 Jan 2008 17:40:30 +0300 Ivan Kokshaysky wrote: e. > > > Ivan, you posted one a while ago, but never seemed to get any > > confirmation if it helped or not. Should I use that and drop > > Arjan's? > > Actually I'm strongly against Arjan's patch. First, it's based on > assumption that the MMCONFIG thing is sort of fundamentally broken > on some systems, but none of the facts we have so far does confirm > that. And second, I really don't like the implementation as it breaks > all non-x86 arches (or forces them to add a set of totally meaningless > PCI functions). no it doesn't! Other arches need no changes. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/