Received: by 10.223.164.202 with SMTP id h10csp617362wrb; Mon, 13 Nov 2017 11:52:39 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMZMC1S9TuQA/DngfGKcsmbMfcBxiXd/3cJejd6yVo8JUH8fYwpKPxTW+it5H5kjNS55W3aM X-Received: by 10.84.195.164 with SMTP id j33mr9890858pld.399.1510602759078; Mon, 13 Nov 2017 11:52:39 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1510602759; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=rU9EOGgpVj6cXcIr9UTFcsGTL2z085V1/yhLOFllwe3sJkgJTlkavNGb1+wL7MolwA wkGAGJJyt+pr9SfKr/nczq43cb/VdBZwpAvrskyxFxR+uv+R0+PtFSbel9/0hCz5veTD +xoCRRzG4LrCKVdu+RkhJDlfyx9u2/aJvQbD0pyGFwFmXLspzCN1KAAAtplx0+l4xNXQ JExyuusAyjBhw6H9sIs7q4puU8sTunZbDPHURN3cDAUTpDE8E+4HkVfDiloeUPj33oAo 1BnjHsWGronKOMuAMJ6N0wPvp1KIX0GwTcl+lUWF11TM7tXvWE9FmwgJ1dIZ2fRvYSyJ 2lmg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject:dkim-signature :arc-authentication-results; bh=czcWQ5aKA8sqcjb0HZZq8ke8H5M6Pa5+4F0rfjUCbSM=; b=DS2jfE4fJ4q+far8K3ScRUMPIquXqqGs89SD9jn/zu3yMVVoIBp0YaNCckZfx1nk7F EXkpZrOvK76+o5Zs/6ojUgX4Mq6/46PM0cMr75Ah+PJvoByFQLX0uCxSx9ANbXF5HHVr isr1uz8S+ybQF7lmjjOzIZYRehTy/0g0S1mjerzrarjanP1C+9+DJs95PkMkrhvM8exr KUYzMtzpmPrcdsLm4muRJ6NFIsKxstsom7HWbi3frohXO3p7JartJz3rcY1qRnow+5F0 mZerbup3apWXxm3VexZ/CaI/DA+H60NtLPPkgUzs2sf2ClN6LACOd7xBRHzr2Tq87fxq co/g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@ti.com header.s=ti-com-17Q1 header.b=D6PEWIpG; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=QUARANTINE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ti.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id c26si14532077pge.158.2017.11.13.11.52.26; Mon, 13 Nov 2017 11:52:39 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@ti.com header.s=ti-com-17Q1 header.b=D6PEWIpG; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=QUARANTINE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ti.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755074AbdKMTvt (ORCPT + 87 others); Mon, 13 Nov 2017 14:51:49 -0500 Received: from lelnx193.ext.ti.com ([198.47.27.77]:28777 "EHLO lelnx193.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754668AbdKMTvr (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Nov 2017 14:51:47 -0500 Received: from dlelxv90.itg.ti.com ([172.17.2.17]) by lelnx193.ext.ti.com (8.15.1/8.15.1) with ESMTP id vADJpYkk002128; Mon, 13 Nov 2017 13:51:34 -0600 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1510602694; bh=6ynzzRqusg4/ak8CHzXSBhyBKfnUfCXf1CvQM8sVq1k=; h=Subject:To:CC:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=D6PEWIpGO0rFf2V8uEzFntrUXZPg2/7LE4bRrc6qOubx+B9/hUAFmDRbZtKYTnIpU 67hqDZfykmISmvPKmVh8Fav69anGe9mHwt2jFYzNbxMSB0T/DC3L1smemv/hY6cl51 ZkfI8YyBYhIVD8kPHtxFvGVoglr4nC6g/kd5H3as= Received: from DFLE107.ent.ti.com (dfle107.ent.ti.com [10.64.6.28]) by dlelxv90.itg.ti.com (8.14.3/8.13.8) with ESMTP id vADJpXLQ013862; Mon, 13 Nov 2017 13:51:33 -0600 Received: from DFLE110.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.31) by DFLE107.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.28) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P256) id 15.1.845.34; Mon, 13 Nov 2017 13:51:33 -0600 Received: from dflp33.itg.ti.com (10.64.6.16) by DFLE110.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.31) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_0, cipher=TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA) id 15.1.845.34 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 13 Nov 2017 13:51:33 -0600 Received: from [10.1.3.6] (ileax41-snat.itg.ti.com [10.172.224.153]) by dflp33.itg.ti.com (8.14.3/8.13.8) with ESMTP id vADJpUjg020630; Mon, 13 Nov 2017 13:51:30 -0600 Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the devicetree tree with the drm tree To: Frank Rowand , Stephen Rothwell , Rob Herring , Rob Herring , ave Airlie , DRI CC: Mark Brown , Frank Rowand , Stephen Boyd , Linux-Next Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , "airlied@linux.ie" , Daniel Vetter , "Valkeinen, Tomi" References: <20171030203756.35brom4ulrbgqesv@sirena.co.uk> <20171113165831.19ebc9fa@canb.auug.org.au> <153e4593-2ebb-c091-49c8-b8d44d5caeb5@ti.com> <917c5115-3d36-92bd-2713-5a6119fc82ca@gmail.com> From: Jyri Sarha Message-ID: <6e7a5a3e-c5a9-7069-74bc-06037761af93@ti.com> Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2017 21:51:29 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <917c5115-3d36-92bd-2713-5a6119fc82ca@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 11/13/17 20:43, Frank Rowand wrote: > Hi Jyri, > > On 11/13/17 07:40, Jyri Sarha wrote: >> On 11/13/17 07:58, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> On Mon, 30 Oct 2017 20:37:56 +0000 Mark Brown wrote: >>>> Today's linux-next merge of the devicetree tree got a conflict in: >>>> >>>> drivers/gpu/drm/tilcdc/tilcdc_slave_compat.c >>>> >>>> between commit: >>>> >>>> 44cd3939c111b7 ("drm/tilcdc: Remove redundant OF_DETACHED flag setting") >>>> >>>> from the drm tree and commit: >>>> >>>> f948d6d8b792bb ("of: overlay: avoid race condition between applying multiple overlays") >>>> >>>> from the devicetree tree. >>>> >>>> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This >>>> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial >>>> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree >>>> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating >>>> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly >>>> complex conflicts. >>>> >>>> diff --cc drivers/gpu/drm/tilcdc/tilcdc_slave_compat.c >>>> index 482299a6f3b0,54025af534d4..000000000000 >>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/tilcdc/tilcdc_slave_compat.c >>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/tilcdc/tilcdc_slave_compat.c >>>> @@@ -163,12 -162,8 +162,6 @@@ static struct device_node * __init tilc >>>> return NULL; >>>> } >>>> >>>> - ret = of_resolve_phandles(overlay); >>>> - if (ret) { >>>> - pr_err("%s: Failed to resolve phandles: %d\n", __func__, ret); >>>> - return NULL; >>>> - } >>>> - of_node_set_flag(overlay, OF_DETACHED); >>>> -- >>>> return overlay; >>>> } >>>> >>> Just a reminder that this conflict still exists. >>> >> After some consideration, I think we can drop the dts backward >> compatibility code from drm/tilcdc. It seems that it is causing a lot of >> trouble and I do not even know if anybody uses it anymore. Here is a >> patch for dropping it: >> >> https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2017-November/157394.html >> >> I did not plan to merge it before v4.16, but if this is a bigger problem >> I can push is right now for v4.15. >> >> Best regards, >> Jyri >> > The dropping patch is much appreciated. > > It would make life easier for me if the patch gets into v4.15-rc. Dave, Daniel? Would you take this late addition to v4.15 still, if I would send a pull request now? The patch is pretty much orthogonal to the rest of drm as it is only dealing with device tree stuff. Best regards, Jyri -- Texas Instruments Finland Oy, Porkkalankatu 22, 00180 Helsinki. Y-tunnus/Business ID: 0615521-4. Kotipaikka/Domicile: Helsinki From 1583977585625606676@xxx Mon Nov 13 18:45:41 +0000 2017 X-GM-THRID: 1582716362758856630 X-Gmail-Labels: Inbox,Category Forums,HistoricalUnread