Received: by 10.223.164.202 with SMTP id h10csp2764284wrb; Sun, 19 Nov 2017 06:13:40 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMZ6RLQiL6PL5w6QrlR3ZWeMVe9Ulu8r2DbSddQmMNoUhjssrR/XsuhFd7ziIW+f8xqXIkQx X-Received: by 10.84.131.6 with SMTP id 6mr11209494pld.100.1511100820567; Sun, 19 Nov 2017 06:13:40 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1511100820; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=nFPYnhIAVLsUgbqnnZuhPsg7Pfxj1MxmaebJamTpX0gTG9/l0EAOVpjtHLwwiGL9T2 7/B6110FoWKgunR4Eoy+UX975HneYE+QmpV1FLKwTmPrCmr5qQu12SnS/oScxnkE2k4J 3R4YmfEKj4s17hFwJ0pUcWsEXg2Mjoa43SbkwPmkzOUA+n1dc0K8sCh+WzZCRcwNlxgy S+3fx61kiXsvP2gycyRLIdoO3WgJ8aUIBdWuJmh4uK/zsqLL14soxXNhfUiccPoqr9lW tveW3tr9umPFr9fJwbV0XU57JRUdevNEv2GNuVt8mDMaX7Xiaq4T9/qyzRqAK3a5hHUz qHLQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:arc-authentication-results; bh=bD0BO9N/D4IODX2rZAE/v9kZwwNGfVbQPvvj1xuQrGU=; b=cH7vCJ4f6rKuPoOeetFU+/IHonfuw6+EdI48MT2ncGVsXCXLK5vRoXVV2oOQOjUBQe 2iJzqfUkm8iaX2A6/hG5rD/vjwV+1EeY10+y9Grlbr7CQEpbZZrXNA4Z43os39xQohCf eLKbxFuQtFovTNM24tw7R6eUN3sOtF0P2ze7xFk7xizu0MImSJ5mH1+mfTbD88jFbLKd ketWkMmibAtvcW3HHicAZnmNFNg+UqA6Z7xyVEl7z8xXbHHFeGc1iC3UjJ4b2XJyMM1t 0L4H0Ex3K6T20Vwee19J0oVjuxEdyZGu403Zrz4YMEbTPIbxvQd6iw+TS02MCs/E+0Cp IsmQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id e7si6780331pfl.148.2017.11.19.06.13.29; Sun, 19 Nov 2017 06:13:40 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750996AbdKSOMR (ORCPT + 72 others); Sun, 19 Nov 2017 09:12:17 -0500 Received: from eddie.linux-mips.org ([148.251.95.138]:45346 "EHLO cvs.linux-mips.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750767AbdKSOMQ (ORCPT ); Sun, 19 Nov 2017 09:12:16 -0500 Received: (from localhost user: 'ladis' uid#1021 fake: STDIN (ladis@eddie.linux-mips.org)) by eddie.linux-mips.org id S23992121AbdKSOMOlbYbQ (ORCPT + 1 other); Sun, 19 Nov 2017 15:12:14 +0100 Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2017 15:12:13 +0100 From: Ladislav Michl To: Pavel Machek Cc: Sebastian Reichel , pali.rohar@gmail.com, kernel list , linux-arm-kernel , linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, tony@atomide.com, khilman@kernel.org, aaro.koskinen@iki.fi, ivo.g.dimitrov.75@gmail.com, patrikbachan@gmail.com, serge@hallyn.com, abcloriens@gmail.com, clayton@craftyguy.net, martijn@brixit.nl, sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com, arnd@arndb.de, Filip =?iso-8859-2?Q?Matijevi=E6?= Subject: Re: bh1770 hacks: get it to work on n950 Message-ID: <20171119141213.my7dnc77xbun3gfj@lenoch> References: <20171116115703.GA26735@amd> <20171117113540.3bapqvq6mfuovxuw@earth> <20171119124150.GA25154@amd> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20171119124150.GA25154@amd> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170609 (1.8.3) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Nov 19, 2017 at 01:41:50PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > On Fri 2017-11-17 12:35:40, Sebastian Reichel wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 12:57:03PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > Hi! > > > > > > Ok, not for application, but I can get light sensor to work. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Pavel Machek > > > > There is no mainline user of this driver and it has a custom API, so > > I think the driver should be dropped and an IIO based one should be > > created instead. > > While I agree IIO interface might be better, and would welcome > patches, I don't think that dropping the driver is right action at > this point. That's the most elegant solution at all. How would you later motivate people to try and test IIO driver? Let's pretend this patch have never existed until someone notices and starts playing "you broke kernel ABI" game. Thank you, ladis From 1584498345659948519@xxx Sun Nov 19 12:42:56 +0000 2017 X-GM-THRID: 1584233053474950413 X-Gmail-Labels: Inbox,Category Forums,HistoricalUnread