Received: by 10.223.164.202 with SMTP id h10csp937307wrb; Fri, 17 Nov 2017 11:05:28 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMYY41EfYmyqSRzUDAfJ5BlYquSH+byiZq37Vg9+fL+RyWpcotKk0/SNsD1nRvpK2b2o5J4Y X-Received: by 10.159.211.10 with SMTP id bc10mr6290541plb.160.1510945528844; Fri, 17 Nov 2017 11:05:28 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1510945528; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=i5yiZ0fSXvQiVvv+ojvhRZzpqSYcz06maMSJbXj2F2VKHFsBt9gsHgk4tbBt+NzruH p6zbWAMp1Dvxmj1jtCq8xF1vStsCP+qG1BpEE1cXvXVVrP+0FcTiw/ORIO1QDj1xT+Ob rvseI/9d+COT6YnscgFJXrOhjLuiRQjteNIQzuo/SbQUg13BGk5YOYPHe0XY42ejD9Zv B4039RGD4f9zvkBXZIDUgUeeCzYLeiygZBzVRPi8bRDzoaLUIktNphzKnzBl6adAIA1j 7gEaoXlqIFH1OxUIPLZ5EiOvVW2kfOpNXiL0hemWByzUPZLgx3kcxtEeIvoWjQQk8fdn KAqA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:arc-authentication-results; bh=LnJHJvt0fJfdNbHJdvnQhmtDAFVcMTKaMKzZgCXpglk=; b=erijVscttWB02710cMR42RJbDb5sqBhdeu3t7zCkESkmOuaT1bgSgGpWMny+DRJPqC BH5hKzCiVGo5AikOg4Q1GBQF4MFaaUxR1a7ExduX3em91ZdcQNU4/srAnAnI1zHE2bkJ 4WdaMO7HM5q6WGx5DKCMAMLXDbxNofsAVDsmKguUhXl651trj2UGUH7lJExWQFcmFWLs MS6Gwkh2VayFqoUDKL4sZjjBU/pYYDzzLuAOaQ6OHMYpJj/VDQ+7idT6Gg7cCSxbBisf duzPN6TueYoFKYiPBhnWKxhDRCTY9lLcMlYG3e1+mnBK72j1bbISH60UobqZOUQy7/9c mBzA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id x9si3179588pgo.721.2017.11.17.11.05.15; Fri, 17 Nov 2017 11:05:28 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030251AbdKQN6o (ORCPT + 92 others); Fri, 17 Nov 2017 08:58:44 -0500 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:32808 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933314AbdKQN6h (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Nov 2017 08:58:37 -0500 Received: from localhost (LFbn-1-12253-150.w90-92.abo.wanadoo.fr [90.92.67.150]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 27967927; Fri, 17 Nov 2017 13:58:37 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2017 14:58:42 +0100 From: Greg KH To: Emil Velikov Cc: Ville =?iso-8859-1?Q?Syrj=E4l=E4?= , "intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "stable@vger.kernel.org" , alexander.levin@verizon.com, ML dri-devel Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH AUTOSEL for 4.9 36/56] drm/i915: Fix the level 0 max_wm hack on VLV/CHV Message-ID: <20171117135842.GC10105@kroah.com> References: <20171115024521.5884-1-alexander.levin@verizon.com> <20171115024521.5884-36-alexander.levin@verizon.com> <20171115110805.GX10981@intel.com> <20171115164451.ogl3ku6qr3cfnbk7@sasha-lappy> <20171115170320.GK10981@intel.com> <87bmk15em2.fsf@intel.com> <20171117124123.GB24300@kroah.com> <20171117125343.GF10981@intel.com> <20171117125959.GA29420@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.1 (2017-09-22) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 01:13:27PM +0000, Emil Velikov wrote: > Hi Greg, all, > > Pardon for the silly question, but I'm struggling to find > documentation about this new 'autoselection' process? > Where can one read up on it - be that about the tooling or the heuristics used? > > I think the above may be the core reason behind the discussion here. See my other email on this topic already (hint, it shouldn't matter how the patch is selected if at least one experienced developer feels it might be a valid stable patch...) thanks, greg k-h From 1584341156402598937@xxx Fri Nov 17 19:04:29 +0000 2017 X-GM-THRID: 1584098816291195041 X-Gmail-Labels: Inbox,Category Forums,HistoricalUnread