Received: by 10.223.164.202 with SMTP id h10csp879760wrb; Wed, 15 Nov 2017 09:21:30 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMYsTJTeMFcJQKxc+OBgtX5XGOlkNwP6LfkjS7X3Q2/UvSCxr8eszylATrWaqJrrvQWcS4Ll X-Received: by 10.98.32.206 with SMTP id m75mr18395499pfj.231.1510766490656; Wed, 15 Nov 2017 09:21:30 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1510766490; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=UCEJZY3qwB6ZjwLdyoOms12Ip+UCswyW1iNysCQUUedhKe0HXCCe5DYBpuMZAtVksj 9cnDqnIfsPqUFojLJsUtNoaNNIFxXyLHsUBODMlodX+2A050tY8xGlErAu/jPE5KWl7M IQNf3vYTnQxclTVkDBxpLYKX3Lhn6KhrZ/q7oSQk2lOSnBL20RQXmPyv9RLaDhWB61Wh DbcBjBRUmP+KNreMVB7r9uvlw/J0RR7ueDRKliand8HwOQP1ki8al9S6zK3dgL3y4kmZ tME0aLlDKqiiElsR4RgD8eXiRlYD1/WR1Nmf2sJjQu4XnueyfQ9KwhCbobPNcs0E9t7F f/HA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:cc:to :subject:from:dkim-signature:arc-authentication-results; bh=LrYMCyQm9Lbhf33j3bwwZRv3WxcrMOvATIOwdQKu9n8=; b=OpKy+82pPOcCE4NcItN/utwV1ZiZdO/nSvdjYpc+YQfY4xtUTZmz7Z0sQ5w0LNl0GY fVv/7TEBLr9Le1/CANahR4ftazrGFVYKkPM6S6G5Za6TN3SQ1i+G79X2KLOXHMFP90cj wSSpKc7jEilfh4vGJ8V2ziMIYM7jazHsT3XpJVfp86BWrZU9z4hpWb1lrnp8uG1+IP3k Ok88UytaeW7DdcNPF224jiszPjh2dTzTXidT5tJK2WO+HJ6w3DOP21xvrnQKKPFpQoFV b7MyKLYxfQqwH/+01v1fMxfOf9B1DZhRjcbaU9SPAx6uZP+To3bXwaWvfGVqYbAEAq7+ C/7w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=temperror (no key for signature) header.i=@micronovasrl.com header.s=dkim header.b=D4Kutt7N; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id e91si18305218plb.350.2017.11.15.09.21.16; Wed, 15 Nov 2017 09:21:30 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=temperror (no key for signature) header.i=@micronovasrl.com header.s=dkim header.b=D4Kutt7N; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933052AbdKOQbB (ORCPT + 90 others); Wed, 15 Nov 2017 11:31:01 -0500 Received: from mail.micronovasrl.com ([212.103.203.10]:37406 "EHLO mail.micronovasrl.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757881AbdKOQah (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Nov 2017 11:30:37 -0500 Received: from mail.micronovasrl.com (mail.micronovasrl.com [127.0.0.1]) by mail.micronovasrl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE222B01809 for ; Wed, 15 Nov 2017 17:30:33 +0100 (CET) Authentication-Results: mail.micronovasrl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass reason="pass (just generated, assumed good)" header.d=micronovasrl.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=micronovasrl.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-language:content-type :content-type:mime-version:user-agent:date:date:message-id:to :subject:subject:from:from; s=dkim; t=1510763433; x=1511627434; bh=QMMWG2ZxUfXF+6/nFWakPbPDwQrmhCo6f4rH/7VaFSc=; b=D4Kutt7N52n5 JrVj4Xn7zsX8MlWOfUkyEHvlwMckGj1SvG5lyjfkMdhjYJfURYyjo9n1wv8YtwV7 hw4xaCAGZZEpC+Lwh5uD9hHJ/bY3jHw4iBEA8jCJ8LC2IkJ11KxsGqSM8jwM7jn7 9771lds6e/j04nTGG+YkWES0ihVOllI= X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mail.micronovasrl.com Received: from mail.micronovasrl.com ([127.0.0.1]) by mail.micronovasrl.com (mail.micronovasrl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id gMfCGhQWG25e for ; Wed, 15 Nov 2017 17:30:33 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.123.215] (benettig-pc.dominio.micronovasrl.com [192.168.123.215]) by mail.micronovasrl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D34C0B008F0; Wed, 15 Nov 2017 17:30:32 +0100 (CET) From: Giulio Benetti Subject: Re: Re: edt-ft5x06 question To: linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com, rydberg@bitmath.org, linux@roeck-us.net, stefan.schoefegger@ginzinger.com, luca@lucaceresoli.net, simon.budig@kernelconcepts.de, martink@posteo.de, a.mathur@samsung.com Message-ID: <49b16b2c-772d-b9d6-993a-063c41e46200@micronovasrl.com> Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2017 17:30:32 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Language: it Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Luca, I had problems with e-mail filter, so I rebuilt yours by hand. Forgive me. See below. Thanks Kind regards > Hi Giulio, > > On 14/11/2017 22:42, Giulio Benetti wrote: > > Hello everybody, > > > > I'm using ft5206 with edt-ft5x06.c driver, > > but what I see is that registers with M09 or M06 > > seem different from focaltech ft5206 > > https://www.buydisplay.com/download/ic/FT5206.pdf > > > > For example, except address 0x80 for threshold register(thgroup), > > all the others don't appear: > > GAIN 0x30 or 0x92 should be 0x82(thcal maybe?) > > > > Can someone clarify this? > > Are you having any problems, or just investigating? I need to add some other IC register to calibrate sensibility with different glasses, but starting from ft5x06 or other Focaltech standard IC FW. > > > Maybe M06 or M09 are a custom firmware for focaltech ft5x, > > then it has different registers? > > All the FT5x06 are 8051-based chips designed to implement touchscreen > controllers. The FT5x26 are similar but with a more powerful core > (Cortex-M IIRC). > > As far as I could understand and guess, their register interface is > fully implemented in firmware, so it could change completely from one > panel to another. However all panels that I have seen seem to use > firmwares with either the "M06" or the "M09" protocol, which are > implemented in the Linux driver. In my case driver recognizes M09, but only address 0x80 register(thgroup) is correct. The others: GAIN: 0x92 GAIN: 0x93 GAIN: 0x94 GAIN: 0x95 are not described in that datasheet. The point is that datasheet seems to be official by Focaltech, like if they deliver that IC with a standard FW inside. I can't find a way to safely probe if it's a standard FW or from EDT M09 or M06. I wouldn't write a different driver ft5x.c because it's a repeatition, but EDT seems a special version(FW) of ft5x. Maybe on dt-bindings I could force to be EDT or standard. On legacy sunxi-3.4 the driver handled this as datasheet I mentioned. What do you think? > > The driver also performs some checks to understand which of the two > protocols is implemented by the controller. These checks are quite > horrible, but they worked for me. I have FW with registers as described at https://www.buydisplay.com/download/ic/FT5206.pdf and I would like to add them as attributes more and dt-bindings to improve trimming. I would call those registers the same as manual: THGROUP THCAL etc. And I would also like to add a tasklet that recalibrate every minute(specified by attr or dt-binding). I want to do this(already done succesfully on 3.4) because I've experienced problems on temperature and mechanical drifts. > > The best thing is that you ask a datasheet to your supplier, in order to > make sure about the protocol and avoid guessing. > > Regards, > -- > Luca -- Giulio Benetti R&D Manager & Advanced Research MICRONOVA SRL Sede: Via A. Niedda 3 - 35010 Vigonza (PD) Tel. 049/8931563 - Fax 049/8931346 Cod.Fiscale - P.IVA 02663420285 Capitale Sociale � 26.000 i.v. Iscritta al Reg. Imprese di Padova N. 02663420285 Numero R.E.A. 258642 From 1584125581413642826@xxx Wed Nov 15 09:58:00 +0000 2017 X-GM-THRID: 1584085398794430736 X-Gmail-Labels: Inbox,Category Forums,HistoricalUnread