Received: by 10.223.164.202 with SMTP id h10csp2086578wrb; Sat, 18 Nov 2017 12:37:56 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMacHD6Jl04o5Qv11Ti93/DAhprHsUgUqfFlgTgFQj6+d+tASfn60RH9eD7Am7Te+DzGciE+ X-Received: by 10.98.60.209 with SMTP id b78mr6198272pfk.144.1511037476320; Sat, 18 Nov 2017 12:37:56 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1511037476; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=c/QBQXHxRoj9L+Nd9Jl8ZPcs2vfU6jpr+nP/VhO6GkQeW++wT9z+HDb3BfBv4Tops8 SsXXWXmD/RnM24BOyUWQxQbIAHDjWsvzurCJRj0K2Rjj9HgRufi6L5OndqbiEM2cnYTg ph+0VwVvfF4bq5VCdYOv17dOt7huLwxlUqE0IEfRG8k9iKS2YK6Q+bGqMd9LBctk7zs3 uonA6TInvK2YHYcos3w1PRl+UvgapKV/+zSfnsLJ11gb+ML+cW1/dLPnnnU9x10Sk/lZ xnK9KOk1QTw1jvCJh2nAzf11MkJqeEKTvDNgb5T7h1SO+i19G0djKHruZ/vjLRZtuyFX p7tg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject:dmarc-filter :dkim-signature:dkim-signature:arc-authentication-results; bh=w2T+vLlLd2wfjrP4t0bNxICmkTs5wR9Si/9Xmc0VJ6I=; b=lDA/y4kIPOYZ0VSV+8sxbGLSSNb/Sh4hwZelUKxjrVr1goobl9A+ouWbkoDanBoKBL gvQ16tfYkDvIvYn64XL//GdeUQFr7QdHTK10H85kDdgJF6m+nKaV8en6OEfNdW+zTAB8 bocdaDac2A0s9jatg+xO8xk9ILcAkhYGgBP9o5gsLdIpw0jjjDXB3xA/mm7BC/ZiKsPs ji10zdTqVz/4J3zkxVWIqj33Tox8/y/LpydUQ3AG2ReEQ7n/NktU0Gk/SSkKrcK8mex/ 2uKb3kbCIBSZnCDLGS4+AZjJc7fHB0s8+s3jVoq7v16Cr3BhaEIuAcrC5Acu88mtmYSu 5QSw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@codeaurora.org header.s=default header.b=muSGpuZw; dkim=pass header.i=@codeaurora.org header.s=default header.b=muSGpuZw; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 189si2374995pfu.338.2017.11.18.12.37.35; Sat, 18 Nov 2017 12:37:56 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@codeaurora.org header.s=default header.b=muSGpuZw; dkim=pass header.i=@codeaurora.org header.s=default header.b=muSGpuZw; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1763872AbdKRB1b (ORCPT + 93 others); Fri, 17 Nov 2017 20:27:31 -0500 Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]:42716 "EHLO smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1763795AbdKRB1X (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Nov 2017 20:27:23 -0500 Received: by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 86A7D602A3; Sat, 18 Nov 2017 01:27:22 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=codeaurora.org; s=default; t=1510968442; bh=Zb5nThvN00CWwH68chr+BZRDHdtAoRY2L2VRlFF1p88=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=muSGpuZwcmfit6D2mulrpoEVHFtR0EXE71yn2iesvLgEmRVlWSXYBp4+4s2wrcvGN M9xesiC/NB9ra3pOcbsLHlmibpJjFVwguIxiOUNGzQ4jq1opqPLIMHM2ZQzgeOpGP3 nzXcX96+jYwxO+PDTeTloLfRcnLtaGDTTOWLSRWM= X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=2.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from [192.168.142.6] (i-global254.qualcomm.com [199.106.103.254]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: clew@smtp.codeaurora.org) by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BE74A602A3; Sat, 18 Nov 2017 01:27:21 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=codeaurora.org; s=default; t=1510968442; bh=Zb5nThvN00CWwH68chr+BZRDHdtAoRY2L2VRlFF1p88=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=muSGpuZwcmfit6D2mulrpoEVHFtR0EXE71yn2iesvLgEmRVlWSXYBp4+4s2wrcvGN M9xesiC/NB9ra3pOcbsLHlmibpJjFVwguIxiOUNGzQ4jq1opqPLIMHM2ZQzgeOpGP3 nzXcX96+jYwxO+PDTeTloLfRcnLtaGDTTOWLSRWM= DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 smtp.codeaurora.org BE74A602A3 Authentication-Results: pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=codeaurora.org Authentication-Results: pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=clew@codeaurora.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/5] remoteproc: qcom: Introduce sysmon To: Bjorn Andersson Cc: Andy Gross , Ohad Ben-Cohen , Arun Kumar Neelakantam , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, runminw@codeaurora.org References: <20171115201012.25892-1-bjorn.andersson@linaro.org> <20171115201012.25892-5-bjorn.andersson@linaro.org> <0ab5497e-94b4-6450-d680-14f002188714@codeaurora.org> <20171117055832.GR28761@minitux> From: Chris Lew Message-ID: Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2017 17:27:21 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20171117055832.GR28761@minitux> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 11/16/2017 9:58 PM, Bjorn Andersson wrote: > On Thu 16 Nov 12:05 PST 2017, Chris Lew wrote: >>> + req.event = SSCTL_SSR_EVENT_BEFORE_SHUTDOWN; >> >> Are there plans to add the other SSR events to sysmon notifiers? I think the >> SSCTL service expects to receive events about remote procs starting as well. >> > > We could easily add support here to send out the AFTER_BOOTUP > notification, beyond that we would need to extend the subdev notifiers > as well. > > But the downstream code paths does confuse me, can you confirm that > these messages are actually sent to the remote ssctl services? > > Regards, > Bjorn > Yea the other three events are definitely sent to the remote. The remote side posts the events for other modules to query. I'm not sure if all of the events are used by other other modules though. Thanks, Chris -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project From 1584320639466346381@xxx Fri Nov 17 13:38:22 +0000 2017 X-GM-THRID: 1584169667655788003 X-Gmail-Labels: Inbox,Category Forums,HistoricalUnread