Received: by 10.223.164.202 with SMTP id h10csp2131838wrb; Sat, 18 Nov 2017 13:48:29 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMbRwEjjfaGpqRisdLqz3qdQG12truY0ZX074HQTZAc/P+tGrymmBDTKyNf4XyxCxCtrFo4w X-Received: by 10.99.51.11 with SMTP id z11mr9293045pgz.223.1511041709549; Sat, 18 Nov 2017 13:48:29 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1511041709; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=MhiWoJ9M0ISUSkGXP5zPIKn1DmQUZDEZOHxUFk0BshZCpmYPInXBqmaB8VdOdc8eeQ DZIpLUDESALUt+eona1C2wGvVkW7QCSq9Zt+D1rbG7aVNiwQ0AXCEQUA0wyJhOzVS6TK pqcDtEN5zVbhy04BaKGkJVBJPyLOELi3XrbcWTscr70V2NAuBnLiQ4pA04eAQ2RT7olu TC83A7LxW8V9gauYuKdQ0zZzhU37GzCgx93Euk5w0h4RjXv0uZRAaKGqlsWDVRQfGga0 TaqnOS+Elg34tKWIiATH3D1rzPQzJjVqQOKn1gwVOxqulFJxjKKP1xO6kdX9Afs1WbOg W/9A== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject:arc-authentication-results; bh=E6qsnIj6bhCiQUhLupn5NtnT9wm5nhosiAyX76yaI0c=; b=gPWAxp9WJO2rS66ab+HbYsq/xUAMzQDtG4xY9417tJ1Tm5mgLs3hclbg9gu+9p+xUU 8Pn1GrJzAe48OfGaS+UHHJn8aC3hZqBjAacHV5C8esG4WABHeSyNIZTCWSUrvvdN3t4f YzoUOlirVJqZr4WtxZUdc5fEPlhGqLnWjC9Y+AQ2RiAR+eOvEGe1G4X+ngpB8qtYd941 7gqGQu+VFN7eEEmx04iPdQus5gNN2JLcne8ddkjUEp0mvsaR0IeCN+o/pncPpWzBJgAM Dlc6J1kAwgkPrRPeMEphPIEVRAnfCg+adnGZUNqLjfpAfFCsud25ZXDEVISdxcvWtfB6 vrsA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gentoo.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id bg5si5124056plb.458.2017.11.18.13.48.06; Sat, 18 Nov 2017 13:48:29 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gentoo.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S967198AbdKRByP (ORCPT + 93 others); Fri, 17 Nov 2017 20:54:15 -0500 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([140.211.166.183]:40222 "EHLO smtp.gentoo.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1764096AbdKRByH (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Nov 2017 20:54:07 -0500 Received: from [10.128.12.82] (unknown [100.42.98.196]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: chutzpah) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CACC133BEBE; Sat, 18 Nov 2017 01:54:05 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [nfsd4] potentially hardware breaking regression in 4.14-rc and 4.13.11 To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Kees Cook , Emese Revfy , Al Viro , Bruce Fields , "Darrick J. Wong" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux NFS Mailing List , stable , Thorsten Leemhuis , "kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com" References: <40ad7c6e-f0d7-959a-bf29-d3e3843f5d31@gentoo.org> <23f7da04-95f7-24e7-ee70-ce40c5b8fee3@gentoo.org> <67939ef3-29c6-762c-7afe-46cc69630d95@gentoo.org> <3d948180-6bd7-c4e9-5ac8-5baef9cc15a7@gentoo.org> <09f2480f-e8e8-645b-6d94-b6ae4ca47806@gentoo.org> From: Patrick McLean Message-ID: <242b16cd-056a-1499-2b65-69084dac1d8d@gentoo.org> Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2017 17:54:03 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2017-11-17 04:55 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 4:27 PM, Patrick McLean wrote: >> >> I am still getting the crash at d9e12200852d, I figured I would >> double-check the "good" and "bad" kernels before starting a full bisect. > > .. but without GCC_PLUGIN_RANDSTRUCT it's solid? Yes, without GCC_PLUGIN_RANDSTRUCT it's solid. > Kees removed even the baseline "randomize pure function pointer > structures", so at that commit, nothing should be randomized. > > But maybe the plugin code itself ends up confusing gcc somehow? > > Even when it doesn't actually do that "relayout_struct()" on the > structure, it always does those TYPE_ATTRIBUTES() games. From 1584435863205641968@xxx Sat Nov 18 20:09:48 +0000 2017 X-GM-THRID: 1583547152812815582 X-Gmail-Labels: Inbox,Category Forums,HistoricalUnread